Yes. I am willing to go along with changing the name and start a vote asap on what it should be.
As far as I’m concerned this vote can remain open and the second vote can proceed in parallel. If the first vote concludes with “yes”, then the second vote will be void. I don’t see that waiting to start a second vote until the first vote finishes is beneficial. I’d REALLY like to have this wrapped up before the board meeting next week. To be official: No (binding) > On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > > Is this a “No” Binding vote? > >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 from me. >> >>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>> >>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name? I don't >>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -Alex >>> >>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>> >>>> No (binding) >>>> >>>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? >>>>> >>>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. >>>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be >>>>> discussed. >>>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called. >>>>> >>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT. >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
