Thank you and I agree so long as FlexJS is not on the second ballot. I recommend a preference list.
Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 14, 2017, at 12:21 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes. I am willing to go along with changing the name and start a vote asap on > what it should be. > > As far as I’m concerned this vote can remain open and the second vote can > proceed in parallel. If the first vote concludes with “yes”, then the second > vote will be void. I don’t see that waiting to start a second vote until the > first vote finishes is beneficial. > > I’d REALLY like to have this wrapped up before the board meeting next week. > > To be official: > No (binding) > >> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:55 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> Is this a “No” Binding vote? >> >>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 11:36 AM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 from me. >>> >>>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 9:28 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>> >>>> Can we stop this vote thread and start a new one for a new name? I don't >>>> want to wait until Sunday to start voting on the new name. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>>> On 9/14/17, 10:33 AM, "Peter Ent" <p...@adobe.com.INVALID> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> No (binding) >>>>> >>>>>> On 9/14/17, 11:37 AM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? >>>>>> >>>>>> [ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. >>>>>> [ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be >>>>>> discussed. >>>>>> [ ] Abstain - Don¹t care what the forked project is called. >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours until Sunday September 17, 16:00 UT. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
