+1 I did: - manually check the release using the new end-to-end tests: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3911 <https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/3911>. - verify that the source builds - Check the (transitive) dependencies of flink-dist compared to 1.2.x. The new deps are: com.squareup.okio (ASL), com.squareup.okhttp3 (ASL) (due to shading this does not catch all dependencies, though)
> On 30. May 2017, at 10:58, Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> wrote: > > Thank you all for the +1 votes so far. > > As far as I see it, none of the issues mentioned in the thread are blockers. > > I've started putting together the blog post for the release announcement. > It is ready to review here: https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/62 > > On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 5:16 PM, jincheng sun <sunjincheng...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Robert, >> >> +1 to release: >> >> Check items have been checked, as follows: (flink-table) >> >> 1.Check that the JAVA and SCALA logical plans are consistent. >> 2.Check that the SQL and Table API logical plans are consistent. >> 3.Check that UDF, UDTF, and UDAF are working properly in group-windows and >> over-windows. >> 4.Check that all built-in Agg on Batch and Stream are working properly. >> 5.Let types such as Timestamp, BigDecimal or Pojo flow through UDF. UDTF, >> UDAF (input and output types). >> >> Cheers, >> SunJincheng >> >> >> 2017-05-29 22:57 GMT+08:00 Gyula Fóra <gyula.f...@gmail.com>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have found an issue with rescaling incremental checkpoints: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-6762 >>> >>> I am not sure if this is regarded as a blocker, it depends on our >>> assumptions about externalized checkpoints. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Gyula >>> >>> Robert Metzger <rmetz...@apache.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2017. máj. 29., >> H, >>> 15:59): >>> >>>> +1 to release: >>>> >>>> - Tested building job against staging repository >>>> - tested YARN session start and container recovery on YARN >>>> - Validated HA on YARN (per job and session mode) >>>> - Incremental checkpointing with rocksdb works >>>> - FsStatebackend with async snapshots works >>>> >>>> - Flink builds from source on Linux (includes rat license header check) >>>> - source doesn't contain binaries >>>> - checked md5 / sha512 sum of source archive (assuming the other sums >> are >>>> valid as well) >>>> >>>> >>>> I noticed one minor thing: the copyright in the NOTICE file is >> 2014-2016. >>>> I'll update it on master and the release branch. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Chesnay Schepler <ches...@apache.org >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>>> * Builds from source >>>>> * start/stop scripts work >>>>> * logs don't show anything suspicious on startup/shutdown >>>>> * ran some example jobs >>>>> * ran jobs on yarn with exactly-once & RocksDB >>>>> o canceling with savepoint/resuming from savepoint >>>>> o without/with rescaling >>>>> * SideOutputs work >>>>> * Metrics are properly transmitted & displayed in the webUI >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28.05.2017 20:33, Robert Metzger wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> @Shaoxuan, I don't think missing documentation is a release blocker, >>> but >>>>>> it's something we should fix asap and with high priority :) >>>>>> Since the documentation is not bundled with the release, and the >> docs >>>> are >>>>>> build off the "release-x.y" branch, we can always update them (even >>>> after >>>>>> the release). >>>>>> >>>>>> However, it makes sense to have the docs ready when we announce the >>>>>> release >>>>>> so that users can understand how to use the newly released features. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 6:14 PM, Chesnay Schepler < >> ches...@apache.org >>>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I've responded in the JIRA. In my opinion isn't a functional issue, >>> but >>>>>>> more about improving >>>>>>> error messages/documentation. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 27.05.2017 18:07, Gyula Fóra wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi! >>>>>>>> I have found this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira >>>>>>>> /browse/FLINK-6742 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not sure if it's a blocker or not (not even completely sure what >>>> causes >>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> at the moment) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Gyula >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Shaoxuan Wang <wshaox...@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2017. máj. >>>> 27., >>>>>>>> Szo, >>>>>>>> 6:30): >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Robert. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Will doc update be a blocker for release? >>>>>>>>> Release 1.3 has many updates on tableAPI and SQL, and the docs >> are >>>> kind >>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>> lagging. We are trying the efforts to update the doc as much as >>>>>>>>> possible >>>>>>>>> before the release is officially published, but I am hoping this >> is >>>>>>>>> not a >>>>>>>>> blocker for the release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Shaoxuan >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Robert Metzger < >>>> rmetz...@apache.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> this is the second VOTEing release candidate for Flink 1.3.0 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The commit to be voted on: >>>>>>>>>> 760eea8a < >>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/760eea8 >>>>>>>>>> a> >>>>>>>>>> (*http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/760eea8a >>>>>>>>>> <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/760eea8a >>> *) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Branch: >>>>>>>>>> release-1.3.0-rc3 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at: >>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.3.0-rc3 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint >>>>>>>>>> D9839159: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at: >>>>>>>>>> *https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach >>>>>>>>>> eflink-1122 >>>>>>>>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapach >>>>>>>>>> eflink-1122 >>>>>>>>>> * >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The vote ends on Tuesday (May 30th), 7pm CET. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.3.0 >>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package, because ... >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
