+1 Ran the build + test, all good
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 > > * Verified checksums and signature files > * Verified that each jar in binary tarball is in the license > * Notice have copyright from 2012, we should update it (not a blocker in > my mind) > * Checked top level files (NOTICE, ...) > * Run tests > > Jarcec > > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:28:36PM -0700, Hari Shreedharan wrote: > > This is a vote for the next release of Apache Flume, version 1.5.0. We > are > > voting on release candidate RC1. > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > http://s.apache.org/4eQ > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, > > *.sha1) for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > > https://people.apache.org/~hshreedharan/apache-flume-1.5.0-rc1/ > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-1001/ > > > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=8633220df808c4cd0c13d1cf0320454a94f1ea97 > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flume/KEYS > > > > > > Thanks, > > Hari > -- thanks ashish Blog: http://www.ashishpaliwal.com/blog My Photo Galleries: http://www.pbase.com/ashishpaliwal
