+1 Looks good to me! Wolfgang Hoschek
On May 17, 2014, at 8:47 PM, Hari Shreedharan <[email protected]> wrote: > Flume PMC - Please vote! > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <[email protected]>wrote: > >> +1 >> >> * Verified signatures and checksums for both binary and source tarballs >> * Rat check looks good on source tarball >> * Nit: Notice file has dated header, needs to be updated but not a blocker >> >> Regards, >> Arvind Prabhakar >> >> >> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Hari Shreedharan >> <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> This is a vote for the next release of Apache Flume, version 1.5.0. We >> are >>> voting on release candidate RC1. >>> >>> It fixes the following issues: >>> http://s.apache.org/4eQ >>> >>> *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** >>> >>> The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, >>> *.sha1) for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: >>> https://people.apache.org/~hshreedharan/apache-flume-1.5.0-rc1/ >>> >>> Maven staging repo: >>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-1001/ >>> >>> >>> The tag to be voted on: >>> >>> >>> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=8633220df808c4cd0c13d1cf0320454a94f1ea97 >>> >>> Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: >>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flume/KEYS >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Hari >>> >>
