+1. * Verified Signatures and Checksums * Compared LICENSE file against the libs directory in both profiles - all binary jars are covered by the license. * Checked top-level files.
Thanks, Hari On Sunday, May 18, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote: > +1 Looks good to me! > > Wolfgang Hoschek > > On May 17, 2014, at 8:47 PM, Hari Shreedharan <[email protected] > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > Flume PMC - Please vote! > > > > > > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <[email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected])>wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > * Verified signatures and checksums for both binary and source tarballs > > > * Rat check looks good on source tarball > > > * Nit: Notice file has dated header, needs to be updated but not a blocker > > > > > > Regards, > > > Arvind Prabhakar > > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Hari Shreedharan > > > <[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])>wrote: > > > > > > > This is a vote for the next release of Apache Flume, version 1.5.0. We > > > are > > > > voting on release candidate RC1. > > > > > > > > It fixes the following issues: > > > > http://s.apache.org/4eQ > > > > > > > > *** Please cast your vote within the next 72 hours *** > > > > > > > > The tarball (*.tar.gz), signature (*.asc), and checksums (*.md5, > > > > *.sha1) for the source and binary artifacts can be found here: > > > > https://people.apache.org/~hshreedharan/apache-flume-1.5.0-rc1/ > > > > > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflume-1001/ > > > > > > > > > > > > The tag to be voted on: > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=flume.git;a=commit;h=8633220df808c4cd0c13d1cf0320454a94f1ea97 > > > > > > > > Flume's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > > > http://www.apache.org/dist/flume/KEYS > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hari > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
