Re: user-friendly plugin names

[Addi]

Diwaker Gupta wrote:

The naming convention for the plugins is fine, but I think it would be nice if 
users are able to declare required plugins using simpler names like "pdf", 
"text", "docbook" and so on.

We can figure out what simple names exactly to use later. I just wanted to see 
what people feel about this? It should be trivial to implement (though I have 
_no_ clue how! :-D), and I think it'll make config much less intimidating 
(even I get scared typing org.apache.forrest.input.viewHelper.xhtml.ls)

Diwaker
 

Yup, I have to say I agree.  It is also a pain when going to the plugin 
dir in linux to manually install the plugin because I like to use tab to 
finish out long filenames but I pretty much have to type the whole thing 
in since they all start with the same long name before getting to the 
actual useful part of the name.

- Addi