I just noticed this addition to the board report for Forrest and have
not noticed a copy of it going to our developer list.

I totally agree with this addition and thank David for adding it. My
purpose for forwarding here is to highlight this issue to the widest
possible community.

In short we would welcome someone building a release for Forrest -
anyone can do it and as David says it is well documented (and I'm sure
people will come out of the woodwork to help in the odd spare minute).

Ross

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From:  <cross...@apache.org>
Date: 2009/8/19
Subject: board: r19010 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
To: board-...@apache.org


Author: crossley
Date: Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009
New Revision: 19010

Log:
Reply to Forrest comment from rf.

Modified:
   foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt

Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt
==============================================================================
--- foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt (original)
+++ foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009
@@ -435,6 +435,12 @@
       [ approved: jj, dc, rf
         comments:
           rf: no releases in 2.33 years? why not?
+     crossley: One reason is that no one has stepped forward to be the Release
+               Manager. As we all know, that takes some effort. Also as our
+               past board reports indicate, the developers seem busy with other
+               things. It could release now as-is, the process is well-defined.
+               There are some improvements that developers have hoped to
+               integrate, but not yet managed to do.
         ]

    L. Apache HTTP Server Project [William A. Rowe Jr. / Brett]





-- 
Ross Gardler

OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk