I just noticed this addition to the board report for Forrest and have not noticed a copy of it going to our developer list.
I totally agree with this addition and thank David for adding it. My purpose for forwarding here is to highlight this issue to the widest possible community. In short we would welcome someone building a release for Forrest - anyone can do it and as David says it is well documented (and I'm sure people will come out of the woodwork to help in the odd spare minute). Ross ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <cross...@apache.org> Date: 2009/8/19 Subject: board: r19010 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt To: board-...@apache.org Author: crossley Date: Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009 New Revision: 19010 Log: Reply to Forrest comment from rf. Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt ============================================================================== --- foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt (original) +++ foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009 @@ -435,6 +435,12 @@ [ approved: jj, dc, rf comments: rf: no releases in 2.33 years? why not? + crossley: One reason is that no one has stepped forward to be the Release + Manager. As we all know, that takes some effort. Also as our + past board reports indicate, the developers seem busy with other + things. It could release now as-is, the process is well-defined. + There are some improvements that developers have hoped to + integrate, but not yet managed to do. ] L. Apache HTTP Server Project [William A. Rowe Jr. / Brett] -- Ross Gardler OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk