On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:49 AM, Tim Williams<william...@gmail.com> wrote: > Is that repository only for Members? I see "board" in committers but > it doesn't have the reports in them. Are they public once final?
It looks like the minutes are available, but the comments aren't, right? Unless, of course, I'm missing them somewhere... http://www.apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2009/board_minutes_2009_05_20.txt --tim > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Ross Gardler<rgard...@apache.org> wrote: >> I just noticed this addition to the board report for Forrest and have >> not noticed a copy of it going to our developer list. >> >> I totally agree with this addition and thank David for adding it. My >> purpose for forwarding here is to highlight this issue to the widest >> possible community. >> >> In short we would welcome someone building a release for Forrest - >> anyone can do it and as David says it is well documented (and I'm sure >> people will come out of the woodwork to help in the odd spare minute). >> >> Ross >> >> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> From: <cross...@apache.org> >> Date: 2009/8/19 >> Subject: board: r19010 - /foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt >> To: board-...@apache.org >> >> >> Author: crossley >> Date: Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009 >> New Revision: 19010 >> >> Log: >> Reply to Forrest comment from rf. >> >> Modified: >> foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt >> >> Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt >> ============================================================================== >> --- foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt (original) >> +++ foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009 >> @@ -435,6 +435,12 @@ >> [ approved: jj, dc, rf >> comments: >> rf: no releases in 2.33 years? why not? >> + crossley: One reason is that no one has stepped forward to be the >> Release >> + Manager. As we all know, that takes some effort. Also as our >> + past board reports indicate, the developers seem busy with >> other >> + things. It could release now as-is, the process is >> well-defined. >> + There are some improvements that developers have hoped to >> + integrate, but not yet managed to do. >> ] >> >> L. Apache HTTP Server Project [William A. Rowe Jr. / Brett] >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ross Gardler >> >> OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research >> http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk >> >
