Ross Gardler wrote: > I just noticed this addition to the board report for Forrest and have > not noticed a copy of it going to our developer list.
They are unpublished agenda items, so the dev list is not usually copied. We don't often get queried on the board report. I was going to follow up with Forrest PMC when any Board discussion settled. > I totally agree with this addition and thank David for adding it. My > purpose for forwarding here is to highlight this issue to the widest > possible community. > > In short we would welcome someone building a release for Forrest - > anyone can do it and as David says it is well documented (and I'm sure > people will come out of the woodwork to help in the odd spare minute). Thanks. -David > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Author: crossley > Date: Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009 > New Revision: 19010 > > Log: > Reply to Forrest comment from rf. > > Modified: > ? ?foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt > > Modified: foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt > ============================================================================== > --- foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt (original) > +++ foundation/board/board_agenda_2009_08_19.txt Wed Aug 19 08:03:49 2009 > @@ -435,6 +435,12 @@ > [ approved: jj, dc, rf > comments: > rf: no releases in 2.33 years? why not? > + crossley: One reason is that no one has stepped forward to be the Release > + Manager. As we all know, that takes some effort. Also as our > + past board reports indicate, the developers seem busy with other > + things. It could release now as-is, the process is well-defined. > + There are some improvements that developers have hoped to > + integrate, but not yet managed to do.
