Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday.
>
> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos
> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated.
I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos.
More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the
"site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and
"master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and
"2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively.
--
Thanks,
Daniel Dekany
> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9
>> days without any reaction.
>>
>>
>> This is a forwarded message
>> From: Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM
>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process?
>>
>> ===8<==============Original message text===============
>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help),
>>
>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might
>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have
>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files
>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I
>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if
>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance",
>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like
>> that... Please advise!
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Daniel Dekany
>>
>>
>>
>> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>>
>>
