I also hope that there's no much to do at this point, however, my understanding was that clearance has to be voted: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#poding-ip-clearance
BTW, at the end of September, I hope to be able to do 2.3.24-RC1-incubating at last, and I hope there will be no bureaucratic obstacles. Let me know if any of you know of any! -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Sunday, September 20, 2015, 5:14:17 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > Daniel, > > I think we are done with the IP clearance process at this point, > the required CLAs and SFAs are all filed. > > Kind regards, > > Jacopo > > References: > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-clean-up > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance > > > On Sep 12, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: >> >>> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday. >>> >>> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both repos >>> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated. >> >> I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos. >> More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the >> "site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and >> "master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and >> "2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively. >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >>> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9 >>>> days without any reaction. >>>> >>>> >>>> This is a forwarded message >>>> From: Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >>>> To: [email protected] >>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM >>>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process? >>>> >>>> ===8<==============Original message text=============== >>>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help), >>>> >>>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might >>>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have >>>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files >>>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I >>>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if >>>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance", >>>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like >>>> that... Please advise! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks, >>>> Daniel Dekany >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ===8<===========End of original message text=========== >>>> >>>> >> > >
