OK. If it's good enough for ASF, it's surely good for me. (What will bit a bit funny though, is that in the last monthly report I have stated that we are starting the IP clearance soon, also some PPMC members have signed that. Now it turns out that it was already done... Whatever.)
-- Thanks, Daniel Dekany Monday, September 21, 2015, 9:43:54 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > > On Sep 20, 2015, at 6:09 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I also hope that there's no much to do at this point, however, my >> understanding was that clearance has to be voted: >> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#poding-ip-clearance > > I am saying we are done because of the following document > (referenced by the document you mention above): > > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > > and specifically: > > "This form is not for new projects. This is for projects and PMCs > that have already been created and are receiving a code donation into an > existing codebase." > > This also adds some interesting details: > > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance > > quoting: > > "Existing codebases need to be imported through the standard IP > clearance process. This means that a Software Grant Agreement (SGA) > or Contributor License Agreement (CLA) need to be submitted for all > copyright owners. This process may take a while so it is best to > start as soon as the podling is accepted. The acceptance of the > initial codebases is approved by the IPMC as part of the acceptance > motion. So, no vote is required by the PPMC." > >> >> BTW, at the end of September, I hope to be able to do >> 2.3.24-RC1-incubating at last, and I hope there will be no >> bureaucratic obstacles. Let me know if any of you know of any! > > I don't. A tool that is useful to prepare and audit the release is the > following: > > http://creadur.apache.org/rat/ > > Regards, > > Jacopo > >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> Daniel Dekany >> >> >> Sunday, September 20, 2015, 5:14:17 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: >> >>> Daniel, >>> >>> I think we are done with the IP clearance process at this point, >>> the required CLAs and SFAs are all filed. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> >>> Jacopo >>> >>> References: >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-clean-up >>> http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-ip-clearance >>> >>> >>> On Sep 12, 2015, at 3:31 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Saturday, September 12, 2015, 10:49:37 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote: >>>> >>>>> Daniel, sorry, I'll try to go through this on Monday. >>>>> >>>>> For provenance purposes what it's important is to have tagged in both >>>>> repos >>>>> (original and asf) the concrete version that has been donated. >>>> >>>> I have added "donated-to-asf" tags in both the GitHub and ASF repos. >>>> More precisely, as the "freemarker" repository (as opposed to the >>>> "site" and "docgen" repos) has 3 branches ("2.3-gae", "2.3" and >>>> "master"), there we have "2.3-gae-donated-to-asf" and >>>> "2.3-donated-to-asf" and "master-donated-to-asf", respectively. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks, >>>> Daniel Dekany >>>> >>>>> On Sep 12, 2015 10:02 AM, "Daniel Dekany" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Just wanted to bring the below mail to your attention, as it was now 9 >>>>>> days without any reaction. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> This is a forwarded message >>>>>> From: Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2015, 12:56:50 AM >>>>>> Subject: [Mentors] Starting IP clearance process? >>>>>> >>>>>> ===8<==============Original message text=============== >>>>>> Dear Mentors (and others who want to help), >>>>>> >>>>>> We have the 3 repos (freemarker, docgen, site) imported as you might >>>>>> noticed from the flood of commit messages (sorry...), and I have >>>>>> changed the copyright headers, ensured that the 3 standard legal files >>>>>> (NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER) are there, and removed files that I >>>>>> have spotted with unclear copyright. So, gloss over the 3 projects if >>>>>> you want to, and then I think I should add a tag like "ip-clearance", >>>>>> and the more official review could be started. Or something like >>>>>> that... Please advise! >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Daniel Dekany >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ===8<===========End of original message text=========== >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > >
