Yes, you are right; I was confused because I have actually tested them when
I have voted +1 to the previous attempt (you have announced the new vote in
the same time I have casted mine).

Here is my vote:

+1

Jacopo


On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 10:20 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote:

> Those also look fine to me. The artifacts has the new NOTICE files,
> and the the sha1 and md5 checksums are correct.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>  Daniel Dekany
>
>
> Saturday, January 16, 2016, 4:34:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
>
> > I was talking about the files here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/freemarker/2.3.24-rc01-incubating/
> >
> > Jacopo
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>
> wrote:
> > Friday, January 15, 2016, 9:46:31 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> the release files and the hashes/signatures seem to be the same of the
> >> previous attempt. Maybe I am missing something but I was expecting a new
> >> version of them so that we could test the integrity of the bundles.
> >
> > Which one? They seem to me up to date
> > (
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-rc01-incubating/binaries/apache-freemarker-2.3.24-rc01-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
> ,
> > etc.)
> >
> > OTOH I see something funny with the sha512 files. If I check them out
> > with SVN, they are fine. But if I download them from the web URL, they
> > come down gzip-ed... But I assume this glitch has nothing to do with
> > the release files.
> >
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Jacopo
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I did an update. No functionality/stability changes, only legal ones
> >>> and some build script change:
> >>>
> >>> - NOTICE file changes:
> >>>   - Added missing META-INF/NOTICE to the Maven javadoc artifact
> >>>   - More precise and readable font-related section in the binary
> >>>     distribution
> >>>   - Customized META-INF/NOTICE in freemkarker.jar, to fit this
> >>>     particular artifact.
> >>> - `ant maven-dist` now selects the appropriate target Maven repo
> >>>   (snapshot VS staging) based on the version number.
> >>>
> >>> All the links remain as there were. Except, the Git commit hashes
> >>> change to this:
> >>>
> >>> Normal version:
> >>>   "2.3" branch commit hash: b9ca91dd5c3b04121f5ddcb9f6194c1e7931ba2c
> >>>
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=b9ca91dd5c3b04121f5ddcb9f6194c1e7931ba2c
> >>>
> >>> Google App Engine ("gae") compliant version:
> >>>    "2.3-gae" branch  commit hash:
> 0c71d8f99323577d9683d924c51d617eb0346d15
> >>>
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=0c71d8f99323577d9683d924c51d617eb0346d15
> >>>
> >>> Please review and vote!
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>  Daniel Dekany
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thursday, January 7, 2016, 10:29:32 PM, Daniel Dekany wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Dear Mentors, and everyone else!
> >>> >
> >>> > Here's the 2nd attempt on 2.3.24-rc01-incubating. Nothing has changed
> >>> > that affects FreeMarker's functionality/stability. These are merely
> >>> > fixes related to licensing files and Apache packaging conventions.
> >>> >
> >>> > As previously, if you can, please test the release with your own
> >>> > FreeMarker-dependent projects, and in general try to find rough
> edges,
> >>> > tell your insights. The binary with full documentation and change
> log:
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/engine/2.3.24-rc01-incubating/binaries/apache-freemarker-2.3.24-rc01-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> >>> >
> >>> > Git:
> >>> >
> >>> >   Normal version:
> >>> >   "2.3" branch commit hash: ce1dc19b3ccfb734af551c2d694a3a3d1039f7fa
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=ce1dc19b3ccfb734af551c2d694a3a3d1039f7fa
> >>> >
> >>> >   Googla App Engine ("gae") compliant version:
> >>> >   "2.3-gae" branch  commit hash:
> >>> > 6166efe1d02fe89a98c7d87ab26a608e2d560492
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-freemarker.git;a=commit;h=6166efe1d02fe89a98c7d87ab26a608e2d560492
> >>> >
> >>> >   (Tagging will happen if and when it indeed becomes to a release.)
> >>> >
> >>> > Maven (jar, javadoc and source artifacts):
> >>> >
> >>> >   Repository:
> >>> >     https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/
> >>> >
> >>> >   Browse (Mentors please check contents):
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/freemarker/2.3.24-rc01-incubating/
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/staging/org/freemarker/freemarker-gae/2.3.24-rc01-incubating/
> >>> >
> >>> >   Maven coordiantes:
> >>> >     <groupId>org.freemarker</groupId>
> >>> >     <artifactId>freemarker</artifactId>
> >>> >     <version>2.3.24-rc01-incubating</version>
> >>> >
> >>> >     or the same with <artifactId>freemarker-gae</artifactId>.
> >>> >
> >>> > The staged dist directory structure:
> >>> >
> >>> >   https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/freemarker/
> >>> >
> >>> > Notes:
> >>> >
> >>> > - See the README for the build instructions.
> >>> >
> >>> > - You can run `ant rat`. If you extract the two distributions (I mean
> >>> >   the binary and source archives) under build/dist/bin and
> >>> >   build/dist/src, it will also check those. (Or if you ran `ant dist`
> >>> >   earlier.)
> >>> >
> >>> > The vote is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of
> >>> > binding votes (3 +1) is reached.
> >>> >
> >>> >     [ ] +1 Release this package
> >>> >     [ ]  0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with the
> release
> >>> >     [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> >>> >
> >>> > If this vote passes, we will start a 2nd vote at general@incubator.
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> >  Daniel Dekany
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>  Daniel Dekany
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >  Daniel Dekany
>
>

Reply via email to