As this issue that we aren't using an apache.org domain comes up again
and again, I propose that we switch to freemarker.apache.org now. Also
to try.freemarker.apache.org. Anybody for or against it?


Friday, October 20, 2017, 10:18:01 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:

>
>> On Oct 20, 2017, at 5:59 AM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> Friday, October 20, 2017, 12:24:30 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>> 
>>> Le 01/10/2017 à 23:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>>> Sunday, October 1, 2017, 8:26:53 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Le 23/09/2017 à 08:44, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>>>>> Friday, September 22, 2017, 11:17:59 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Le 22/09/2017 à 22:22, Daniel Dekany a écrit :
>>>>>>>> Google doesn't like plain HTTP sites as we know (SEO), also I hear
>>>>>>>> that starting from October they want to show warning in Chrome if you
>>>>>>>> have forms on your page. We do have forms... On all page under
>>>>>>>> http://freemarker.org/docs/ there's a search field, and
>>>>>>>> http://try.freemarker.org/ is nothing but a form.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Anyone want to tackle this? Or part of this?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I did that for OFBiz. I can have a look before October.
>>>>>> That would be great, thanks!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jacques
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry, OFBiz still being my priority, I was not able to do it yet.
>>>>> But I should be able to start this week, most likely Monday...
>>>> No problem, and thanks for keep us informed!
>>>> 
>>>>> Jacques
>>> Sorry again, my current contract has changed and I'll not be available 
>>> before November
>>> I'm though trying the new release in OFBiz right now, so far all seems OK :)
>> 
>> The latest Chrome doesn't (yet?) show any warnings on our site, so no
>> problem. (Maybe they only do it if there's a password filed, for now.)
>> 
>> Thanks for the checking the release!
>
> I should also point out that in the last board report the issue of
> freemarker not yet having an apache.org <http://apache.org/> web
> site came up. I would suggest that the project make that transition
> sooner than later if graduation is desired.
>
> Ralph
>

-- 
Thanks,
 Daniel Dekany

Reply via email to