Thursday, March 15, 2018, 5:31:31 PM, Jaime Garza wrote: > Isn’t the license for tm4e eclipse license? It is not apache. Is that an > issue?
That's not a problem. A binary under EPL 1.0, or even EPL 2.0, can be packaged with an Apache product. See https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b. Furthermore in our case it's only part of the binary distribution, not the source distribution (as it's only an external dependency there, together with unavoidable EPL licensed things like Tycho). >> On Mar 15, 2018, at 5:58 AM, Angelo zerr <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Ok thanks Daniel for your answer. >> >> I will try to create a github project with my POC which provides: >> >> * syntax coloration for Freemarker by using TextMate >> * validation by using a basic Freemarker Language Server (based on lsp4j) >> which should work with Eclipse, VSCode, etc >> >> 2018-03-14 22:34 GMT+01:00 Daniel Dekany <[email protected]>: >> >>> Wednesday, March 14, 2018, 4:41:36 PM, Angelo zerr wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Do you want that I create a new eclipse plugin with Freemarker based on >>> tm4e >>>> >>>> Here the result with syntax coloration: >>> >>> Seems to me that the image was removed by the mailing list. But >>> otherwise of course it's good if we have it started, however I can't >>> promise that it will be picked up and continued by someone. Surely I >>> will check it out though. >>> >>>> Regard's Angelo >>>> >>>> >>>> 2018-03-14 12:20 GMT+01:00 Jacopo Cappellato < >>> [email protected]>: >>>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:47 PM, Daniel Dekany <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> It's our turn. I'm really just waiting to hear if the other PPMC >>>>> members think that this should be attempted (like, if we want that >>>>> code at all), then I will ask ASF Legal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> I don't feel much comfortable in commenting on license/legal stuff >>> because >>>> of my lack of confidence on the subject >>>> However I think that we can start by stating our interest in accepting >>> the >>>> codebase donation from RedHat/JBoss. >>>> Then we could figure out the exact steps that need to be followed by them >>>> and by us (trying to minimize the workload n their part as much as >>>> possible) and then we will decide if it is a feasible plan. >>>> >>>> Jacopo >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Daniel Dekany >>> >>> > > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
