I run _both_ gemfire and geode on my laptop and I found this gfsh conflict early on. I created a symbolic link named "geode" and pointed it to the geode gfsh binary. I then just say "geode start locator ...", etc.
I thought of other alternatives but "gesh" wasn't doing it and so I just left it "geode". My vote is to just call it by the product name, geode. *Wes Williams | Pivotal Sr. **Data Engineer* 781.606.0325 http://pivotal.io/big-data/pivotal-gemfire On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 7:41 PM, John Blum <[email protected]> wrote: > This came up in last night's PJUG meeting (** Unleashing the Silicon Forest > Fire: the open sourcing of GemFire **) here in PDX. > > In Pivotal GemFire, the tool is called Gfsh (pronounced "G-fish", meaning > GemFire Shell). > > Perhaps, we can call the Apache Geode "Shell" tool... "GOSH". > > I would say "geosh", but that is 5 letters and sounds related to geography, > compared to "gfsh" being 4 letters, therefore... "gosh"! > > ;-) > > -- > -John > 503-504-8657 > john.blum10101 (skype) >
