+1 keep gfsh for both.
My reasons: 1. There is no legal requirement (or any other for that matter) to change the name 2. The argument for distinguishing between a geode and gemfire installation is weak. Some of us have and switch between multiple installations of GemFire all the time. There are very simple shell environment based mechanisms to deal with this. 3. Impact on existing customers should be seriously considered 4. Last but not least, the artifact itself is not going to be any different between geode and gemfire. Choosing to call it differently in gemfire might imply that there is something different about it, when, in fact, there isn’t. Edin On May 21, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Lynn Hughes Godfrey <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 to calling the interactive shell "geode" > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Vincent Ford <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 to calling the interactive shell "geode" >> >> *Vince Ford* >> GemFire Sustenance Engineering >> Beaverton, OR USA >> 503-533-3726 (office) >> http://www.pivotal.io >> Open Source Project Geode >> https://network.pivotal.io/products/project-geode >> >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Rajesh Kumar <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> +1 >>> >>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Bruce Schuchardt < >> [email protected] >>>> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>> Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Here's my $0.02: >>>>> >>>>> I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> - At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment >>>>> management scripts >>>>> - It's important for users to not cross the streams - - > >> explicit = >>>>> good >>>>> - Managing gfsh vs. gsh in existing scripts is error prone. >> (think >>>>> about troubleshooting classpath for gfsh vs gsh) >>>>> - We have 50+ developers with gfsh on a PC classpath. We don't >> want >>>>> to >>>>> teach them gsh vs. gfsh >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Brian - >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, pulkit chandra < >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> +1 Gsh. >>>>>> >>>>>> If called GoSH I won't mind that either :) . >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> *Pulkit Chandra* >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Namrata Thanvi <[email protected] >>> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +1 for gsh >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Namrata >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < >>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Tushar Khairnar >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> +1 for gsh >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> +1 to gsh (although I do reserve the right to pronounce it as GoSH >>> ;-)) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> Roman. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> >>> >>
