Well, concerning #4, there will be differences in the command-line interface (as perceived by users), particularly for the Gateway/WAN (command) support.
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Edin Zulich <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 keep gfsh for both. > > > My reasons: > > 1. There is no legal requirement (or any other for that matter) to change > the name > 2. The argument for distinguishing between a geode and gemfire > installation is weak. Some of us have and switch between multiple > installations of GemFire all the time. There are very simple shell > environment based mechanisms to deal with this. > 3. Impact on existing customers should be seriously considered > 4. Last but not least, the artifact itself is not going to be any > different between geode and gemfire. Choosing to call it differently in > gemfire might imply that there is something different about it, when, in > fact, there isn’t. > > Edin > > > On May 21, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Lynn Hughes Godfrey < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > +1 to calling the interactive shell "geode" > > > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Vincent Ford <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> +1 to calling the interactive shell "geode" > >> > >> *Vince Ford* > >> GemFire Sustenance Engineering > >> Beaverton, OR USA > >> 503-533-3726 (office) > >> http://www.pivotal.io > >> Open Source Project Geode > >> https://network.pivotal.io/products/project-geode > >> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Rajesh Kumar <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> +1 > >>> > >>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Bruce Schuchardt < > >> [email protected] > >>>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> +1 > >>>> > >>>> Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit : > >>>> > >>>>> Here's my $0.02: > >>>>> > >>>>> I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> - At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment > >>>>> management scripts > >>>>> - It's important for users to not cross the streams - - > > >> explicit = > >>>>> good > >>>>> - Managing gfsh vs. gsh in existing scripts is error prone. > >> (think > >>>>> about troubleshooting classpath for gfsh vs gsh) > >>>>> - We have 50+ developers with gfsh on a PC classpath. We don't > >> want > >>>>> to > >>>>> teach them gsh vs. gfsh > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Brian - > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, pulkit chandra < > >>>>> [email protected]> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> +1 Gsh. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> If called GoSH I won't mind that either :) . > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Best Regards, > >>>>>> *Pulkit Chandra* > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Namrata Thanvi < > [email protected] > >>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> +1 for gsh > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Namrata > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik < > >>> [email protected] > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Tushar Khairnar > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for gsh > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> +1 to gsh (although I do reserve the right to pronounce it as GoSH > >>> ;-)) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>>>> Roman. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > -- -John 503-504-8657 john.blum10101 (skype)
