How about providing a symlink such that we essentially provide paths for
both 'gfsh' and 'geode' to make script transition easier.
I'd agree with Edin on his point #2. I don't think a banner of:
_ _ _ _ _
/\ \ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \ /\ \
/ \ \ / \ \ / \ \ / \ \____ / \ \
/ /\ \_\ / /\ \ \ / /\ \ \ / /\ \_____\ / /\ \ \
/ / /\/_/ / / /\ \_\ / / /\ \ \ / / /\/___ // / /\ \_\
/ / / ______ / /_/_ \/_/ / / / \ \_\ / / / / / // /_/_ \/_/
/ / / /\_____\ / /____/\ / / / / / // / / / / // /____/\
/ / / \/____ // /\____\/ / / / / / // / / / / // /\____\/
/ / /_____/ / // / /______ / / /___/ / / \ \ \__/ / // / /______
/ / /______\/ // / /_______\/ / /____\/ / \ \___\/ // / /_______\
\/___________/ \/__________/\/_________/ \/_____/ \/__________/
...or whatever... is going to be mistaken :)
--Jens
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 3:17 PM, John Blum <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, concerning #4, there will be differences in the command-line
> interface (as perceived by users), particularly for the Gateway/WAN
> (command) support.
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 1:50 PM, Edin Zulich <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > +1 keep gfsh for both.
> >
> >
> > My reasons:
> >
> > 1. There is no legal requirement (or any other for that matter) to change
> > the name
> > 2. The argument for distinguishing between a geode and gemfire
> > installation is weak. Some of us have and switch between multiple
> > installations of GemFire all the time. There are very simple shell
> > environment based mechanisms to deal with this.
> > 3. Impact on existing customers should be seriously considered
> > 4. Last but not least, the artifact itself is not going to be any
> > different between geode and gemfire. Choosing to call it differently in
> > gemfire might imply that there is something different about it, when, in
> > fact, there isn’t.
> >
> > Edin
> >
> >
> > On May 21, 2015, at 12:22 PM, Lynn Hughes Godfrey <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 to calling the interactive shell "geode"
> > >
> > > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Vincent Ford <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 to calling the interactive shell "geode"
> > >>
> > >> *Vince Ford*
> > >> GemFire Sustenance Engineering
> > >> Beaverton, OR USA
> > >> 503-533-3726 (office)
> > >> http://www.pivotal.io
> > >> Open Source Project Geode
> > >> https://network.pivotal.io/products/project-geode
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 10:53 AM, Rajesh Kumar <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:03 PM, Bruce Schuchardt <
> > >> [email protected]
> > >>>>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Le 5/21/2015 10:05 AM, Brian Dunlap a écrit :
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> Here's my $0.02:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I like geode for geode and gfsh for Gemfire.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> - At Southwest Airlines, we have a ton of existing environment
> > >>>>> management scripts
> > >>>>> - It's important for users to not cross the streams - - >
> > >> explicit =
> > >>>>> good
> > >>>>> - Managing gfsh vs. gsh in existing scripts is error prone.
> > >> (think
> > >>>>> about troubleshooting classpath for gfsh vs gsh)
> > >>>>> - We have 50+ developers with gfsh on a PC classpath. We don't
> > >> want
> > >>>>> to
> > >>>>> teach them gsh vs. gfsh
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Brian -
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 11:53 AM, pulkit chandra <
> > >>>>> [email protected]>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> +1 Gsh.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> If called GoSH I won't mind that either :) .
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Best Regards,
> > >>>>>> *Pulkit Chandra*
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Namrata Thanvi <
> > [email protected]
> > >>>
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1 for gsh
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>> Namrata
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <
> > >>> [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Tushar Khairnar
> > >>>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> +1 for gsh
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> +1 to gsh (although I do reserve the right to pronounce it as
> GoSH
> > >>> ;-))
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>> Roman.
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> -John
> 503-504-8657
> john.blum10101 (skype)
>
