+1 I am convinced. Made the change: http://i.imgur.com/41w9yWm.png
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Gregory Chase <gch...@pivotal.io> wrote: > I'm +0 to "Multi-site", but like "multi-cluster" slightly better for two > reasons... > > 1) It comes after "Clustering", showing a ++ more clearly > 2) In my opinion its more inclusive of both "multi-site" and also workload > partitioning where two clusters might be in the same data center, but have > different applications they serve. > > Thoughts? > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:49 AM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io > > > > wrote: > > > > > Take 3: http://i.imgur.com/VUQRw4u.png > > > 1. Replaced Redis logo with http://fontawesome.io/icon/plug/ > > > 2. Changed WAN to Multi-Site. > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Swapnil. > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 7:22 PM, theseusyang <theseusy...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster" is accurated especially for > > > > cluster-2-cluster replication in one DC site. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/update-website-for-WAN-CQ-and-native-client-tp6659p6763.html > > > > Sent from the Apache Geode (Incubating) Developers Forum mailing list > > > > archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -John > > 503-504-8657 > > john.blum10101 (skype) > > > > > > -- > Greg Chase > > Global Head, Big Data Communities > http://www.pivotal.io/big-data > > Pivotal Software > http://www.pivotal.io/ > > 650-215-0477 > @GregChase > Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ >
