+1 LGTM!
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 > I am convinced. > Made the change: http://i.imgur.com/41w9yWm.png > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Gregory Chase <gch...@pivotal.io> wrote: > >> I'm +0 to "Multi-site", but like "multi-cluster" slightly better for two >> reasons... >> >> 1) It comes after "Clustering", showing a ++ more clearly >> 2) In my opinion its more inclusive of both "multi-site" and also workload >> partitioning where two clusters might be in the same data center, but have >> different applications they serve. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:49 AM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >> > +1 >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Take 3: http://i.imgur.com/VUQRw4u.png >> > > 1. Replaced Redis logo with http://fontawesome.io/icon/plug/ >> > > 2. Changed WAN to Multi-Site. >> > > >> > > Thanks! >> > > Swapnil. >> > > >> > > On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 7:22 PM, theseusyang <theseusy...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster" is accurated especially for >> > > > cluster-2-cluster replication in one DC site. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > View this message in context: >> > > > >> > > >> > >> http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/update-website-for-WAN-CQ-and-native-client-tp6659p6763.html >> > > > Sent from the Apache Geode (Incubating) Developers Forum mailing list >> > > > archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > -John >> > 503-504-8657 >> > john.blum10101 (skype) >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Greg Chase >> >> Global Head, Big Data Communities >> http://www.pivotal.io/big-data >> >> Pivotal Software >> http://www.pivotal.io/ >> >> 650-215-0477 >> @GregChase >> Blog: http://geekmarketing.biz/ >>
