Thanks everyone for chiming in! These change have been pushed. checkout: http://geode.incubator.apache.org/
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Udo Kohlmeyer <ukohlme...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1, > > to me "Multi-site" is too rigid. People might forget that this is a > inter-cluster comms channel. Which would allow them to have many clusters > running in the same DC, sharing data between them, satisfying the data > requirements for different systems/applications. > > > > On 22/06/2016 4:54 AM, Gregory Chase wrote: > >> I'm +0 to "Multi-site", but like "multi-cluster" slightly better for two >> reasons... >> >> 1) It comes after "Clustering", showing a ++ more clearly >> 2) In my opinion its more inclusive of both "multi-site" and also workload >> partitioning where two clusters might be in the same data center, but have >> different applications they serve. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:49 AM, John Blum <jb...@pivotal.io> wrote: >> >> +1 >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Take 3: http://i.imgur.com/VUQRw4u.png >>>> 1. Replaced Redis logo with http://fontawesome.io/icon/plug/ >>>> 2. Changed WAN to Multi-Site. >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Swapnil. >>>> >>>> On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 7:22 PM, theseusyang <theseusy...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree with Greg, "Multi-Cluster" is accurated especially for >>>>> cluster-2-cluster replication in one DC site. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> >>>>> >>> http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/update-website-for-WAN-CQ-and-native-client-tp6659p6763.html >>> >>>> Sent from the Apache Geode (Incubating) Developers Forum mailing list >>>>> archive at Nabble.com. >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> -John >>> 503-504-8657 >>> john.blum10101 (skype) >>> >>> >> >> >
