I have no problem reading in the string into XML. It just looks ugly in
the plan file.
Regards,
Alan
David Jencks wrote:
I'm not sure this is such a good idea.
It's going to require changing the gbean schema to allow an any
element and mixed content in a gbean attribute element. In principle
I object strongly to mixed content. I think the extra complications
indicate that the CDATA solution is much much simpler. Is there a
problem with it? What are you trying to pass in? What are you doing
with the results? Do you want an XmlObject, a string, a DOM element,
a STAX stream...?
thanks
david jencks
On Feb 22, 2005, at 10:03 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
No reason other then no one ever tried it. If you want to change the
builder code, go for it.
-dain
--
Dain Sundstrom
Chief Architect
Gluecode Software
310.536.8355, ext. 26
On Feb 22, 2005, at 5:31 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Why do I have to wrap XML in CDATA when I want to pass XML to GBean
attributes?
Regards,
Alan
