On 12/5/05, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need to have a strategy on how we are going manage reviewing,
> removing out of date content, and moving valid content from the existing
> Wiki. A lot of the existing content is out of date or irrelevant. We
> need to be careful that we don't end up having two half baked Wikis for
> Geronimo.
I agree John. Allowing stale content to remain is worse than having no
content at all. What we really need is for someone to own the online
content and serve as a wrangler for it. And, no, I am not volunteering
;-) (I certainly see the need but I don't have the time).
> Maybe ApacheCon would be a good opportunity to get everyone together and
> review the content in the existing Wiki. IMHO, if we don't have
> accurate documentation for the 1.0 release then we should reconsidering
> the release (we kind of had an excuse for milestone releases, 1.0 should
> be a step up in quality from milestones.. users will have expectations
> of quality).
Good point, let's plan on discussing this over the weekend at ApacheCon.
> The site shows we are using an Evaluation License. We should have a
> full license if we are relying upon it.
Jason said he was working to get the open source license.
> Is there a way we can set the footer on every page to say that any
> content contributed to the Wiki is under the ASL 2.0 license, with a
> link to the license, or have a notice on the edit page? Documentation
> contributions should not be any different to code contributions.
Agreed, I'm sure there's a way to set a footer containing the license.
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/
