+1 to move 1.1 to trunk and calling it 1.2 +1 for D Jencks suggestion on the naming of the old trunk to 1.2-dead.
Cheers Prasad On 5/22/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 On 5/22/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 > > Paul > > On 5/21/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to make the following changes to the dev tree for Geronimo. Assuming there is > > concurrence and no objections I would like to: > > > > move geronimo/trunk to geronimo/branches/oldtrunk > > copy geronimo/branches/1.1 to geronimo/trunk > > Update trunk to version 1.3. I think 1.3 is a better choice to avoid any confusion over our old 1.2 > > > > I'll plan to do this on Wednesday morning at 0300 PT. > > > > Other thoughts welcome. > > > > Matt > > >
