+1 --jason
On 5/22/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason replied on another thread that he prefers to stay with 1.2 for the release. Here is the proposed nomenclature trunk (stays 1.2 but is completely replaced with branches/1.1) branches/1.1 unchanged branches/dead-1.2 (is a copy of the original trunk) I think that incorporates the thinking so far. I like it. Matt Matt Hogstrom wrote: > I would like to make the following changes to the dev tree for > Geronimo. Assuming there is concurrence and no objections I would like to: > > move geronimo/trunk to geronimo/branches/oldtrunk > copy geronimo/branches/1.1 to geronimo/trunk > Update trunk to version 1.3. I think 1.3 is a better choice to avoid > any confusion over our old 1.2 > > I'll plan to do this on Wednesday morning at 0300 PT. > > Other thoughts welcome. > > Matt > > >
