+1 on the move (non-binding). Quick question though, what is going to
happen to the session api that was added to trunk?
I ask because I'm about to submit a jira and patch that depends on
these api's.
Thanks,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
On May 22, 2006, at 8:00 AM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
+1
On 5/22/06, Aaron Mulder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 5/22/06, Paul McMahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> Paul
>
> On 5/21/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to make the following changes to the dev tree for
Geronimo. Assuming there is
> > concurrence and no objections I would like to:
> >
> > move geronimo/trunk to geronimo/branches/oldtrunk
> > copy geronimo/branches/1.1 to geronimo/trunk
> > Update trunk to version 1.3. I think 1.3 is a better choice
to avoid any confusion over our old 1.2
> >
> > I'll plan to do this on Wednesday morning at 0300 PT.
> >
> > Other thoughts welcome.
> >
> > Matt
> >
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
