+1
Regards,
Alan
Jason Dillon wrote:
+1
--jason
On 5/22/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason replied on another thread that he prefers to stay with 1.2 for
the release.
Here is the proposed nomenclature
trunk (stays 1.2 but is completely replaced with branches/1.1)
branches/1.1 unchanged
branches/dead-1.2 (is a copy of the original trunk)
I think that incorporates the thinking so far. I like it.
Matt
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I would like to make the following changes to the dev tree for
> Geronimo. Assuming there is concurrence and no objections I would
like to:
>
> move geronimo/trunk to geronimo/branches/oldtrunk
> copy geronimo/branches/1.1 to geronimo/trunk
> Update trunk to version 1.3. I think 1.3 is a better choice to avoid
> any confusion over our old 1.2
>
> I'll plan to do this on Wednesday morning at 0300 PT.
>
> Other thoughts welcome.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
