That is correct. I suspect that after we release 1.2 we'll delete the dead-1.2
branch
Bruce Snyder wrote:
On 5/22/06, Matt Hogstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason replied on another thread that he prefers to stay with 1.2 for
the release.
Here is the proposed nomenclature
trunk (stays 1.2 but is completely replaced with branches/1.1)
branches/1.1 unchanged
branches/dead-1.2 (is a copy of the original trunk)
I think that incorporates the thinking so far. I like it.
Just so I'm clear, the idea is that anyone who put changes into the
current trunk (what will be branches/dead-1.2) will need to harvest
those changes themselves to be put back into the new trunk or
elsewhere, correct?
Bruce
