We do not control what openEJB or somesuch ship with. We need to
make all StatsImpl available via g-management.

Thanks
Anita
 
--- "Erik B. Craig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> At the risk of getting caught in the crossfire here...
> 
> So, lets say the classes for jetty or tomcat that extend those in
> o/a/g/management/geronimo/stats reside within same package... are we
> then
> saying that classes extending those for, say, openEJB or somesuch
> would also
> reside here rather than within our openEJB package? If so, how would
> this
> all play into the pluggable server/framework design?
> 
> 
> -Erik
> 
> On Nov 8, 2007 9:31 AM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Anita Kulshreshtha wrote:
> > > David,
> > > Please see
> > >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3586#action_12540957
> > >     To summarize, the question is whether Tomcat*Stats (and
> > > Tomcat*StatsImpl) is a management interface or a tomcat
> interface. To
> > > me, if it imports only management classes, it is a management
> interface
> > > and its implementation which also imports ONLY management classes
> > > belongs in g-management.
> > >     Given that all management interfaces and their 33
> implementations
> > > are in g-management,
> >
> > Just to clarify the structure and the history:
> >
> > The standard Stats from the the JSR77 spec are in
> o/a/g/management/stats
> >
> > The "generic" Geronimo Stats which are extensions to the spec are
> in
> > o/a/g/management/geronimo/stats
> >
> > Until recently, the o/a/g/management/geronimo/stats package only
> > included generic stats classes (meaning they were not supposed to
> be
> > specific to the implementation of the component such as Jetty or
> > Tomcat).  Jetty specific classes which extended these generic
> classes
> > were in o/a/g/jetty and the intention was that tomcat specific
> classes
> > would be included in tomcat.
> >
> > Joe
> >
> >
> 
> 
> -- 
> Erik B. Craig
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to