Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!

regards,

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>
> +1 to have one repo per spec
>
> regards,
>
> François
> fpa...@apache.org
> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>> Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
>> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we
>> do one repo per atomic release.
>> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it
>> or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
>> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>>
>> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
>> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to
>> that ;))
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>
>>
>> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net
>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
>>
>>     Hi Mark,
>>
>>     I guess you mean for the release ?
>>
>>     If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single
>>     repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>>
>>     But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec
>>     (less convenient anyway).
>>
>>     Regards
>>     JB
>>
>>     > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de
>>     <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>> a écrit :
>>     >
>>     > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own
>>     git repo, isn't?
>>     >
>>     > LieGrue,
>>     > strub
>>     >
>>     >
>>     >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org
>>     <mailto:fpa...@apache.org>:
>>     >>
>>     >> Hi,
>>     >>
>>     >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our
>>     project
>>     >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>>     >>
>>     >>
>>     >> I think we can start with this projects:
>>     >>
>>     >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
>>     <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/>
>>     >>
>>     >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
>>     <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/>
>>     >>
>>     >> -
>>     http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
>>     <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/>
>>     >>
>>     >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
>>     <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/>
>>     >>
>>     >>
>>     >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>>     >>
>>     >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
>>     <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo>
>>     >>
>>     >>
>>     >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to
>>     move.
>>     >>
>>     >> regards,
>>     >>
>>     >> --
>>     >> François
>>     >> fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org>
>>     >>
>>     >
>>

Reply via email to