Ok, understand

François
fpa...@apache.org

Le 12/05/2021 à 09:53, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
> let's do a bulk vote for all but spec then a discuss thread dedicated
> to specs if some disagree to have one repo per spec
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 09:49, Francois Papon
> <francois.pa...@openobject.fr <mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>> a
> écrit :
>
>     You mean having a vote per spec repository?
>
>     regards,
>
>     François
>     fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org>
>
>     Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit :
>>     I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And
>>     then discuss those separate without having any pressure.
>>     Wdyt?
>>
>>     LieGrue,
>>     strub
>>
>>
>>>     Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon
>>>     <francois.pa...@openobject.fr
>>>     <mailto:francois.pa...@openobject.fr>>:
>>>
>>>     Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward!
>>>
>>>     regards,
>>>
>>>     François
>>>     fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org>
>>>     Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>     +1 to have one repo per spec
>>>>
>>>>     regards,
>>>>
>>>>     François
>>>>     fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org>
>>>>     Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit :
>>>>>     Guess we should stick to what we are used to.
>>>>>     The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to
>>>>>     say we do one repo per atomic release.
>>>>>     For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can
>>>>>     automate it or work with infra to bulk migrate it).
>>>>>     Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will:
>>>>>
>>>>>     1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users)
>>>>>     2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved
>>>>>     to that ;))
>>>>>
>>>>>     Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>     @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>     <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>     <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github
>>>>>     <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>>>     <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>>>     
>>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre
>>>>>     <j...@nanthrax.net <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit :
>>>>>
>>>>>         Hi Mark,
>>>>>
>>>>>         I guess you mean for the release ?
>>>>>
>>>>>         If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a
>>>>>         single repo (it’s what I’m doing at ServiceMix).
>>>>>
>>>>>         But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo
>>>>>         per spec (less convenient anyway).
>>>>>
>>>>>         Regards
>>>>>         JB
>>>>>
>>>>>         > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de
>>>>>         <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>> a écrit :
>>>>>         >
>>>>>         > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec
>>>>>         as own git repo, isn't?
>>>>>         >
>>>>>         > LieGrue,
>>>>>         > strub
>>>>>         >
>>>>>         >
>>>>>         >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org
>>>>>         <mailto:fpa...@apache.org>:
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> Hi,
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of
>>>>>         our project
>>>>>         >> repositories from svn to gitbox.
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> I think we can start with this projects:
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/
>>>>>         <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/
>>>>>         <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> -
>>>>>         http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/
>>>>>         <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/
>>>>>         <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects:
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo
>>>>>         <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you
>>>>>         want to move.
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> regards,
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >> --
>>>>>         >> François
>>>>>         >> fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org>
>>>>>         >>
>>>>>         >
>>>>>
>>

Reply via email to