let's do a bulk vote for all but spec then a discuss thread dedicated to specs if some disagree to have one repo per spec
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> Le mer. 12 mai 2021 à 09:49, Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr> a écrit : > You mean having a vote per spec repository? > > regards, > > Françoisfpa...@apache.org > > Le 12/05/2021 à 09:20, Mark Struberg a écrit : > > I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss > those separate without having any pressure. > Wdyt? > > LieGrue, > strub > > > Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon < > francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: > > Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward! > > regards, > > Françoisfpa...@apache.org > > Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit : > > +1 to have one repo per spec > > regards, > > Françoisfpa...@apache.org > > Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : > > Guess we should stick to what we are used to. > The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do > one repo per atomic release. > For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or > work with infra to bulk migrate it). > Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will: > > 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users) > 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;)) > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github > <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn > <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > > Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net> a > écrit : > >> Hi Mark, >> >> I guess you mean for the release ? >> >> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s >> what I’m doing at ServiceMix). >> >> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less >> convenient anyway). >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> a écrit : >> > >> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git >> repo, isn't? >> > >> > LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > >> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org: >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project >> >> repositories from svn to gitbox. >> >> >> >> >> >> I think we can start with this projects: >> >> >> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/ >> >> >> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/ >> >> >> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/ >> >> >> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ >> >> >> >> >> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects: >> >> >> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo >> >> >> >> >> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move. >> >> >> >> regards, >> >> >> >> -- >> >> François >> >> fpa...@apache.org >> >> >> > >> >> >
