I think we could do a VOTE for all repos excluding specs. And then discuss those separate without having any pressure. Wdyt?
LieGrue, strub > Am 12.05.2021 um 08:50 schrieb Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: > > Thanks all for your feedback, I will start a vote to move forward! > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org> > Le 12/05/2021 à 08:46, Francois Papon a écrit : >> +1 to have one repo per spec >> >> regards, >> >> François >> fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org> >> Le 11/05/2021 à 15:13, Romain Manni-Bucau a écrit : >>> Guess we should stick to what we are used to. >>> The most visible part is likely the release so I'm tempted to say we do one >>> repo per atomic release. >>> For specs it likely means one repo per spec (but we can automate it or work >>> with infra to bulk migrate it). >>> Will maybe hurt a bit right now but will: >>> >>> 1. enable PR on github (today it is a mess for external users) >>> 2. make releases easier (monorepo failed, happy we never moved to that ;)) >>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github >>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book >>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >>> >>> Le mar. 11 mai 2021 à 14:00, Jean-Baptiste Onofre <j...@nanthrax.net >>> <mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>> a écrit : >>> Hi Mark, >>> >>> I guess you mean for the release ? >>> >>> If we agree to have bunch of tag, we can have spec in a single repo (it’s >>> what I’m doing at ServiceMix). >>> >>> But I guess it would be cleaner to have a dedicated repo per spec (less >>> convenient anyway). >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> > Le 11 mai 2021 à 13:56, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de >>> > <mailto:strub...@yahoo.de>> a écrit : >>> > >>> > specs could be tricky. We'd need to do every single spec as own git repo, >>> > isn't? >>> > >>> > LieGrue, >>> > strub >>> > >>> > >>> >> Am 11.05.2021 um 05:39 schrieb fpa...@apache.org >>> >> <mailto:fpa...@apache.org>: >>> >> >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I would like to start a discussion about moving some of our project >>> >> repositories from svn to gitbox. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> I think we can start with this projects: >>> >> >>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/ >>> >> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/> >>> >> >>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/ >>> >> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/> >>> >> >>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/ >>> >> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/components/txmanager/> >>> >> >>> >> - http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/ >>> >> <http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Here are the current Geronimo gitbox projects: >>> >> >>> >> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo >>> >> <https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf#geronimo> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Any objection? Don't hesitate to add other project you want to move. >>> >> >>> >> regards, >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> François >>> >> fpa...@apache.org <mailto:fpa...@apache.org> >>> >> >>> > >>>
