Actually, the last release (1.0.0.made by JL) was made from SVN and the 
commits, which broke the milestone, were also done on SVN.

So there is an inconsistency for the source of truth here and GitHub is already 
missing changes...


Am 30. November 2024 17:53:16 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau 
<rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>We migrated to gitbox but thought we made svn dir readonly.
>
>Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 16:18, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a
>écrit :
>
>> Good question. Didn't know it is on GitHub, so the patch was in SVN:
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110
>>
>>
>> Am 30. November 2024 15:31:31 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello François,
>>>
>>> What is the difference with last release (
>>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/commits/trunk/)?
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le ven. 29 nov. 2024 à 21:41, Francois Papon <fpa...@apache.org> a
>>> écrit :
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I submit Apache Geronimo Java Mail 2.1_1.0.1 release to your vote.
>>>>
>>>> This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on
>>>> the release note):
>>>>
>>>> ** Bug
>>>>      * [GERONIMO-6871] - InternetHeaders to rejects well-formed headers
>>>>
>>>> Staging Maven repository:
>>>>
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1174/
>>>>
>>>> Staging dist repository:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/javamail
>>>>
>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>
>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to