side note: nothing prevent us to move spec to the github since both are tied (one of the "old time" spec where api can only work with one impl)
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064> Le dim. 1 déc. 2024 à 11:15, Richard Zowalla <r...@apache.org> a écrit : > Ok, I just re-checked ;-) > > What we actually need is a release of the Geronimo Java Mail 2.1 > ___Spec___, which is still in SVN: > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110 > > On GitHub, we have the implementation part, which is not that > important. Of course, we should do a release of it once we have the > fixed spec available. > > Sowe don't need an INFRA ticket here as all the specs are still on SVN > and everything is actually fine. It is just confusing that there is > some part on SVN an some part on GitHub :) > > @Francois: Sorry, I didn't specified it correctly in my first mail > asking for a release :) - I should have written "spec" but the EE mail > world is actually hardly tied to impls... > > Gruß > Richard > > > Am Sonntag, dem 01.12.2024 um 11:05 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: > > Yep, can create an INFRA Ticket with reference to this thread, so we > > can get it fixed up. > > > > Gruß > > Richard > > > > > > Am 1. Dezember 2024 10:33:54 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > I'd say open a ticket to infra to make svn read only, ensure git is > > > sync-ed to not loose anything from anywhere. > > > Generally truth is git (history direction) but we are human beings > > > ;) > > > > > > Le dim. 1 déc. 2024 à 06:47, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> > > > a écrit : > > > > I am always confused where to find the truth in Geronimo, so all > > > > fine :-) > > > > > > > > I guess, the actual issue is, that the SVN repo is/was not read > > > > only. > > > > > > > > So how to proceed? > > > > > > > > I would suggest that we use SVN for this release and migrate to > > > > git afterwards (dropping what is there). We released a version > > > > from SVN and made changes, so the tag is also in SVN. > > > > > > > > WDYT? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 1. Dezember 2024 00:19:47 MEZ schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO > > > > <jeano...@gmail.com>: > > > > > I thought this one was still on SVN. Sorry if I messed up > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 20:20, Richard Zowalla > > > > > <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > > > > > > Actually, the last release (1.0.0.made by JL) was made from > > > > > > SVN and the commits, which broke the milestone, were also > > > > > > done on SVN. > > > > > > > > > > > > So there is an inconsistency for the source of truth here and > > > > > > GitHub is already missing changes... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 30. November 2024 17:53:16 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > > > <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > We migrated to gitbox but thought we made svn dir readonly. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 16:18, Richard Zowalla > > > > > > > <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : > > > > > > > > Good question. Didn't know it is on GitHub, so the patch > > > > > > > > was in SVN: > > > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am 30. November 2024 15:31:31 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni- > > > > > > > > Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > Hello François, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the difference with last release > > > > > > > > > (https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/commits/tr > > > > > > > > > unk/)? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > > > > > > > > @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | > > > > > > > > > Book > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Le ven. 29 nov. 2024 à 21:41, Francois Papon > > > > > > > > > <fpa...@apache.org> a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I submit Apache Geronimo Java Mail 2.1_1.0.1 release > > > > > > > > > > to your vote. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This release mainly includes (other issue description > > > > > > > > > > is available on > > > > > > > > > > the release note): > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ** Bug > > > > > > > > > > * [GERONIMO-6871] - InternetHeaders to rejects > > > > > > > > > > well-formed headers > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Staging Maven repository: > > > > > > > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1174/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Staging dist repository: > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/javamail > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please vote to approve this release: > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide > > > > > > > > > > specific comments) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
