@Francois: I think the process is similar. Tagging and commit is done by the release plugin, so should not be different aside from having SVN Tooling available. Maybe give it a try? (i am sure the Geronimo Slack is able to assist in case of issues).
Gruß Richard Am 2. Dezember 2024 15:45:10 MEZ schrieb Francois Papon <francois.pa...@openobject.fr>: >Ok :) > >It's hard for me to sync that on Monday after 6 hours of meeting :( > >Let me cancel this vote. > >However about the release of the spec on SVN, I'm not sure I can do >that, I never done any release on SVN...I don't want to create a >blackhole :D > >NB: should I revert the github repository from the release? I think so >because it's about the impl, right? > >regards, > >François >fpa...@apache.org >francois.pa...@openobject.fr > >Le 01/12/2024 à 11:14, Richard Zowalla a écrit : >> Ok, I just re-checked ;-) >> >> What we actually need is a release of the Geronimo Java Mail 2.1 >> ___Spec___, which is still in SVN: >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110 >> >> On GitHub, we have the implementation part, which is not that >> important. Of course, we should do a release of it once we have the >> fixed spec available. >> >> Sowe don't need an INFRA ticket here as all the specs are still on SVN >> and everything is actually fine. It is just confusing that there is >> some part on SVN an some part on GitHub :) >> >> @Francois: Sorry, I didn't specified it correctly in my first mail >> asking for a release :) - I should have written "spec" but the EE mail >> world is actually hardly tied to impls... >> >> Gruß >> Richard >> >> >> Am Sonntag, dem 01.12.2024 um 11:05 +0100 schrieb Richard Zowalla: >>> Yep, can create an INFRA Ticket with reference to this thread, so we >>> can get it fixed up. >>> >>> Gruß >>> Richard >>> >>> >>> Am 1. Dezember 2024 10:33:54 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>> I'd say open a ticket to infra to make svn read only, ensure git is >>>> sync-ed to not loose anything from anywhere. >>>> Generally truth is git (history direction) but we are human beings >>>> ;) >>>> >>>> Le dim. 1 déc. 2024 à 06:47, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> >>>> a écrit : >>>>> I am always confused where to find the truth in Geronimo, so all >>>>> fine :-) >>>>> >>>>> I guess, the actual issue is, that the SVN repo is/was not read >>>>> only. >>>>> >>>>> So how to proceed? >>>>> >>>>> I would suggest that we use SVN for this release and migrate to >>>>> git afterwards (dropping what is there). We released a version >>>>> from SVN and made changes, so the tag is also in SVN. >>>>> >>>>> WDYT? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Am 1. Dezember 2024 00:19:47 MEZ schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO >>>>> <jeano...@gmail.com>: >>>>>> I thought this one was still on SVN. Sorry if I messed up >>>>>> >>>>>> Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 20:20, Richard Zowalla >>>>>> <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : >>>>>>> Actually, the last release (1.0.0.made by JL) was made from >>>>>>> SVN and the commits, which broke the milestone, were also >>>>>>> done on SVN. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> So there is an inconsistency for the source of truth here and >>>>>>> GitHub is already missing changes... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 30. November 2024 17:53:16 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>> <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> We migrated to gitbox but thought we made svn dir readonly. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 16:18, Richard Zowalla >>>>>>>> <rich...@zowalla.com> a écrit : >>>>>>>>> Good question. Didn't know it is on GitHub, so the patch >>>>>>>>> was in SVN: >>>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Am 30. November 2024 15:31:31 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni- >>>>>>>>> Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>> Hello François, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What is the difference with last release >>>>>>>>>> (https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/commits/tr >>>>>>>>>> unk/)? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Blog | Github | LinkedIn | >>>>>>>>>> Book >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le ven. 29 nov. 2024 à 21:41, Francois Papon >>>>>>>>>> <fpa...@apache.org> a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I submit Apache Geronimo Java Mail 2.1_1.0.1 release >>>>>>>>>>> to your vote. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This release mainly includes (other issue description >>>>>>>>>>> is available on >>>>>>>>>>> the release note): >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> ** Bug >>>>>>>>>>> * [GERONIMO-6871] - InternetHeaders to rejects >>>>>>>>>>> well-formed headers >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Staging Maven repository: >>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1174/ >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Staging dist repository: >>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/javamail >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide >>>>>>>>>>> specific comments) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>>>>>>
