I thought this one was still on SVN. Sorry if I messed up

Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 20:20, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a
écrit :

> Actually, the last release (1.0.0.made by JL) was made from SVN and the
> commits, which broke the milestone, were also done on SVN.
>
> So there is an inconsistency for the source of truth here and GitHub is
> already missing changes...
>
>
> Am 30. November 2024 17:53:16 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>
>> We migrated to gitbox but thought we made svn dir readonly.
>>
>> Le sam. 30 nov. 2024 à 16:18, Richard Zowalla <rich...@zowalla.com> a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> Good question. Didn't know it is on GitHub, so the patch was in SVN:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-mail_2.1_spec/?pathrev=1922110
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 30. November 2024 15:31:31 MEZ schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello François,
>>>>
>>>> What is the difference with last release (
>>>> https://github.com/apache/geronimo-javamail/commits/trunk/)?
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://x.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/en-us/product/java-ee-8-high-performance-9781788473064>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le ven. 29 nov. 2024 à 21:41, Francois Papon <fpa...@apache.org> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> I submit Apache Geronimo Java Mail 2.1_1.0.1 release to your vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on
>>>>> the release note):
>>>>>
>>>>> ** Bug
>>>>>      * [GERONIMO-6871] - InternetHeaders to rejects well-formed headers
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging Maven repository:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1174/
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging dist repository:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/geronimo/javamail
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote to approve this release:
>>>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release
>>>>> [ ] -1 Don't approve the release (please provide specific comments)
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>
>>>>>

-- 
Jean-Louis

Reply via email to