Hi Leonard,
I believe it is the duty of a good program to *warn* the user when he takes the wrong decision. Let the 3D charts sit there, BUT when a user selects one for use, warn him about this and offer an explanation, why a third dimension is not desirable. I would also suggest to ask a number of high-ranking statisticians to wright this explanation, so that - at least some of the users - would abandon the 3D chart use.

You cannot be earnest, that a warning dialog pops up every time a user choses a 3d type. If we think 3d is bad, we should drop it, otherwise it should be ok. What impression will a user get when we offer him a feature and then bother him by a dialog saying "Don't use that!". Reminds me of a restaurant visit, where a friend ordered something and the chef said: "Oh I wouldn't recommend than, take something else".

e.g. Tell me please, which is bigger, 'Column B' or 'Column C':
<< removed image screenshot from old chart >>

I am not wondering. It was my first guess when seing this chart. But this example is unfair. 1. This is the old chart, not the new one (I thought we were talking about the new chart here). In the new chart the angle is different. 2. The light green and light yellow are quite similar, so you might see them as one piece, and therefore think the yellow piece is bigger.

There are a number of problems even with the standard pie-chart (2D). I mentioned one in my first post.
 - very small values are NOT easily displayed and NOT easy to see

Then don't use them. Should we also warn a user when he types text in Writer and selects a 5pt font that this might be too small? We usually imply that our users are not totally dumb.

BTW., in Excel there is this cool new feature where you have little bars in cells showing a kind of bar chart inside the sheet. They decided to make the bars at least 10% wide, even if the values just make 1% or 0,1%. I would be concerned more about this kind of faking statistics than about correct statistics that you cannot read well. As I also said before: doing charts is not an easy task, most people fail to select the right data to show in the first place. OOo chart cannot help here. It is just a tool to realize the ideas you have in a visual form.

Therefore I would recommend putting some effort into solving this problem.

My opinion: waste of time.

I would also like to be able to rotate (clockwise or counter-clockwise in 2D, NOT 3D) the pie chart (this is especially useful, when one wants to align 2 pie charts). Also, I would sometimes want to swap 2 segments.

I can understand this requirement. You are not the first one (there should exist an issue for this).

Another problem are charts with negative values. I wanted recently to create a pie chart, highlighting the difference between 2 groups (2 pie charts), so I created the difference between the proportions. SOme were positive, some were negative. I would have welcomed a mechanism to automatically group the positive proportions vs the negative proportions (they must sum up to 0, so both groups would have occupied half of the piechart). Instead, the values were used as absolute values AND therefore were intermixed, bringing NO meaning.

This doesn't sound like a very common thing to do. You are always free to regroup your data in a sheet and create a chart out of that. The chart cannot fulfill every wish anyone might have. And things like "they must sum up to 0": what should the chart do if this is not the case? Pop up a dialog: "Sorry, your data doesn't fit me. What you see may be garbage"?

There are many other issues that could be improved.

Really? Never would have thought of that. Sorry, this is not very helpful advice.

BTW: THERE IS NO REASON TO *SHOUT* HERE !!!!

Regards,
Björn

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to