Yup, Apache mailing lists don't like attachments. =) Did we get a JIRA opened for a wiki space? That would seem to be the logical place to put the doc...
A. On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Cédric Champeau <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > This is exactly why I was excited to have you on board as a mentor :) I > have actually started writing a document (in asciidoctor) that I have > attached (unless the ML doesn't allow attachments) which describes our > release process and how TeamCity comes in action. It contains details about > our builds and what we do, I think it would be good if we could collaborate > on this doc, even if I have no strong opinion about where it should sit > (apart that it should not belong to the codebase); > > 2015-03-26 20:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bayer <[email protected]>: > >> Since this is my particular area (both professionally and here at ASF >> Infra), I thought I'd start a discussion on what Groovy has now, what >> Groovy needs going forward, and how to get there. I know Groovy's got a >> bunch of things going on TeamCity currently - so long as whoever's >> providing those resources is willing to keep doing so, that can continue. >> There's no reason we have to suddenly turn it off just because we're at >> Apache now. >> >> Buuuuuut I want to do awesome things with builds.apache.org. So I want to >> know what requirements, environments, etc Groovy has now, as well as what >> we'd like going forward, so that I can find a way to meet those needs on >> ASF infra in the future. I'm literally always looking for excuses to work >> on this stuff, so, yeah. =) >> >> A. >> > >
