I'd say this is appropriate for dev@. Basically, private@ is only for matters that cannot be public - voting/proposing new committers or PMC members most notably, and dealing with issues that can't or shouldn't be discussed publicly. The default assumption should be for any discussion to happen on the public lists.
A. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Cédric Champeau <[email protected]> wrote: > BTW technically speaking should this discussion be on dev@ or private@ ? > > My assumption was that dev@ was more for discussing technical issues with > Groovy itself; and private@ more for issues like this, but I may be wrong. > > 2015-03-27 14:56 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bayer <[email protected] > <javascript:;>>: > > > That'll definitely work for now - I'll start a separate thread on wiki > > options going forward. > > > > A. > > > > On Friday, March 27, 2015, Cédric Champeau <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> > > wrote: > > > > > Ok since I prefer Asciidoctor over Confluence and that the Apache Wiki > > > is... well; what is is, I implemented a simple wiki for Groovy [1]. TBH > > > this is by far my favorite option, because you can use Asciidoctor > > locally > > > to render, and it will integrate well with the website design. > > > > > > So the document about the release process is now rendered directly on > the > > > website [2]. If you want to update it, all you have to do is to edit > the > > > source [3] and submit a pull request. Once a PR is merged, it will take > > > around 5 minutes for the site to be updated. Each "adoc" file in the > > "wiki" > > > directory will automatically create a new file. > > > > > > Questions about the process welcome of course! > > > > > > NB: While nested directories in the wiki are supported, the rendered > page > > > have a problem with stylesheets, I will work later on this. > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/groovy/groovy-website/commit/f1678ab71734647b402c5374b5ae7ee051076bd1 > > > [2] http://groovy-lang.org/wiki/groovy-release.html > > > [3] > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/groovy/groovy-website/blob/master/site/src/site/wiki/groovy-release.adoc > > > > > > > > > 2015-03-27 8:11 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > > > <javascript:;>>: > > > > > > > Confluence preferred then > > > > > > > > 2015-03-27 2:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bayer <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > > > <javascript:;>>: > > > > > > > > > Not that I'm aware of... > > > > > On Mar 26, 2015 17:11, "Emmanuel Lécharny" <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > > > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Le 26/03/15 21:20, Andrew Bayer a écrit : > > > > > > > Ok - would Confluence be ok with everyone? I detest MoinMoin. > =) > > > > > > > > > > > > Yuk :/ > > > > > > > > > > > > Any other option ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Guillaume Laforge > > > > Groovy Project Manager > > > > > > > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > > > > Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ > > > > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> > > > > > > > > > >
