That'll definitely work for now - I'll start a separate thread on wiki options going forward.
A. On Friday, March 27, 2015, Cédric Champeau <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok since I prefer Asciidoctor over Confluence and that the Apache Wiki > is... well; what is is, I implemented a simple wiki for Groovy [1]. TBH > this is by far my favorite option, because you can use Asciidoctor locally > to render, and it will integrate well with the website design. > > So the document about the release process is now rendered directly on the > website [2]. If you want to update it, all you have to do is to edit the > source [3] and submit a pull request. Once a PR is merged, it will take > around 5 minutes for the site to be updated. Each "adoc" file in the "wiki" > directory will automatically create a new file. > > Questions about the process welcome of course! > > NB: While nested directories in the wiki are supported, the rendered page > have a problem with stylesheets, I will work later on this. > > [1] > > https://github.com/groovy/groovy-website/commit/f1678ab71734647b402c5374b5ae7ee051076bd1 > [2] http://groovy-lang.org/wiki/groovy-release.html > [3] > > https://github.com/groovy/groovy-website/blob/master/site/src/site/wiki/groovy-release.adoc > > > 2015-03-27 8:11 GMT+01:00 Guillaume Laforge <[email protected] > <javascript:;>>: > > > Confluence preferred then > > > > 2015-03-27 2:51 GMT+01:00 Andrew Bayer <[email protected] > <javascript:;>>: > > > > > Not that I'm aware of... > > > On Mar 26, 2015 17:11, "Emmanuel Lécharny" <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > Le 26/03/15 21:20, Andrew Bayer a écrit : > > > > > Ok - would Confluence be ok with everyone? I detest MoinMoin. =) > > > > > > > > Yuk :/ > > > > > > > > Any other option ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Guillaume Laforge > > Groovy Project Manager > > > > Blog: http://glaforge.appspot.com/ > > Social: @glaforge <http://twitter.com/glaforge> / Google+ > > <https://plus.google.com/u/0/114130972232398734985/posts> > > >
