Just as I sent the last mail, it appears that the staged site is working now too. Just a delay in the deployment, I guess.
On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:40, PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote: > > https://hamilton.staged.apache.org/ is not working yet but maybe we > can concentrate on https://hamilton.apache.org/ (asf-site branch). We > can get back to Infra team if we need the staged site and we can't get > it working ourselves. I don't want to monopolise their time but we can > raise another issue in the coming days if needs be. > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:33, Stefan Krawczyk <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > awesome thanks! > > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:33 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Already answered by Daniel Gruno. > > > I have https://hamilton.apache.org/ working now. > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:29, PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26920 is the JIRA > > > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:27, Stefan Krawczyk > > > > <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > 👍 sounds good. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:25 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for merging my .asf.yaml. > > > > > > > > > > > > Still no luck though. I'll raise an ASF Infra JIRA to see if that > > > team > > > > > > can help us debug what is happening. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 19:35, Stefan Krawczyk < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Okay I rebased -- should https://hamilton.staged.apache.org/ be > > > being > > > > > > > populated now as I have `asf-staging > > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/tree/asf-staging>` with all > > > the HTML > > > > > > > under content? or? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 11:13 PM Stefan Krawczyk < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cool I created this PR for that piece then > > > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1344>. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 2:29 AM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> The .asf.yaml will need to be merged but we can use a different > > > PR for > > > > > > > >> this. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 at 04:48, Stefan Krawczyk < > > > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > Cool. @PJ I have it building < > > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1339> > > > > > > > >> > and pushing to the asf-staging branch. I assume we need to > > > merge > > > > > > > >> .asf.yaml > > > > > > > >> > to main before it takes effect? Should we do a separate PR > > > for that? > > > > > > > >> Then I > > > > > > > >> > can test this PR more thoroughly by having the staging branch > > > > > > deployed > > > > > > > >> (I > > > > > > > >> > know I will need to change some links)? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 7:42 AM PJ Fanning < > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > The asf yaml docs are at > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/main/README.md#deploy > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > We probably need a section like > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > publish: > > > > > > > >> > > whoami: asf-site > > > > > > > >> > > subdir: content > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > where asf-site is the branch and content is the dir in that > > > > > > branch. > > > > > > > >> > > These 2 values are good ones as they are the most common > > > ones > > > > > > used in > > > > > > > >> > > other ASF projects. > > > > > > > >> > > These settings should mean that hamilton.apache.org is > > > redeployed > > > > > > > >> > > every time the asf-site branch is updated. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > If you read the asf yaml docs, there is also the concept of > > > a > > > > > > staging > > > > > > > >> > > web site - a preview one. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > staging: > > > > > > > >> > > whoami: asf-staging > > > > > > > >> > > subdir: content > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > asf-staging is the most common branch used for this. > > > > > > > >> > > These settings should mean that hamilton.staged.apache.org > > > is > > > > > > > >> > > redeployed every time the asf-staging branch is updated. > > > > > > > >> > > We don't necessarily need to use this staging web site but > > > the > > > > > > support > > > > > > > >> > > for it is there. It can be a nice way to try out changes > > > without > > > > > > > >> > > affecting the main site. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 15:30, Stefan Krawczyk < > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > okay yeah I have a githhub workflow (see this PR > > > > > > > >> > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1339>) that > > > builds the > > > > > > > >> docs. I > > > > > > > >> > > can > > > > > > > >> > > > push it to a different branch other than main placing it > > > under > > > > > > > >> /content > > > > > > > >> > > > (currently it publishes the artifact to github). I think > > > I saw > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> > > > .asf.yaml support that option. That should work right? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 7:23 AM PJ Fanning < > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > If the website code can't be readily removed from > > > > > > apache/hamilton > > > > > > > >> repo > > > > > > > >> > > > > - then we can just leave it as is. We can set up > > > .asf.yaml in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> > > > > apache/hamilton repo to publish the website. > > > > > > > >> > > > > I think the default is to have the website static > > > content in > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> > > > > 'content' directory. > > > > > > > >> > > > > Stefan - can you build the static content for the > > > website and > > > > > > put > > > > > > > >> it > > > > > > > >> > > > > in the 'content' directory. > > > > > > > >> > > > > I can then try to set up .asf.yaml to deploy it. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 15:09, Stefan Krawczyk < > > > > > > > >> > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I can see a separate hamilton-site repo that contains > > > the > > > > > > > >> landing > > > > > > > >> > > page, > > > > > > > >> > > > > but > > > > > > > >> > > > > > what about documentation that relies on source code > > > (which > > > > > > is > > > > > > > >> what > > > > > > > >> > > > > > hamilton.dagworks.io currently is)? We'd still need a > > > > > > process > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > >> > > > > generate > > > > > > > >> > > > > > that and push it somewhere to be published? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 2:43 AM PJ Fanning < > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It would be my preference to separate out the > > > website docs > > > > > > > >> from > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hamilton/ and put them > > > in a > > > > > > > >> separate > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hamilton-site/ repo. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It simplifies the release of Apache Hamilton if we > > > don't > > > > > > need > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > >> > > worry > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > about reviewers having to check the source headers > > > and > > > > > > > >> licensing of > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > everything needed for the website build too. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The simplest initial set up is to have > > > > > > apache/hamilton-site > > > > > > > >> git > > > > > > > >> > > repo > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > set up so that a Hamilton team member can checkout > > > the > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > apache/hamilton-site git repo and run the build on > > > their > > > > > > own > > > > > > > >> > > machine. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The HTML etc for the website gets generated to a > > > directory > > > > > > > >> like > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > `content` or `publish`. The Hamilton team member > > > can then > > > > > > > >> commit > > > > > > > >> > > the > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > content or publish directory into git. We can > > > configure > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> > > .asf.yaml > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > file so that the website is redeployed based on git > > > > > > commits > > > > > > > >> that > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > include changes to the `content` or `publish` dir. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We can look into trying to automate this later. It > > > will > > > > > > need > > > > > > > >> time > > > > > > > >> > > to > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > interact with ASF Infra team to be allowed to have > > > > > > automated > > > > > > > >> jobs > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > commit to the git repo. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 07:24, Stefan Krawczyk < > > > > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Okay just so I mentally I understand. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. We can have documentation source live under > > > /docs > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2. When a PR that changes docs is created/merged > > > we can > > > > > > > >> kick off > > > > > > > >> > > a > > > > > > > >> > > > > github > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > workflow that builds these docs > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 3. Is it correct that we could then push this > > > built > > > > > > HTML to > > > > > > > >> this > > > > > > > >> > > > > other > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > hamilton-site repo? Is that correct? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 4. Then using the `.asf.yaml` in the > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > hamilton-site > > > > > > repo, we > > > > > > > >> > > could use > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the .asf.yaml > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > directives > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > < > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-WebsitedeploymentserviceforGitrepositories > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > to then publish which would update > > > hamilton.apache.org. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is that right? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Stefan > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 5:02 AM PJ Fanning < > > > > > > > >> [email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Redirecting to dev mailing list. Private > > > mailing list > > > > > > is > > > > > > > >> for 2 > > > > > > > >> > > > > things > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > - discussing and voting on new committers and > > > > > > discussing > > > > > > > >> > > security > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > issues. Everything else is meant to be > > > discussed in > > > > > > > >> public. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The main doc for web site publishing is: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/main/README.md > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > We already have a DNS entry set up for > > > > > > > >> hamilton.apache.org. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Most ASF projects push the static content for > > > their > > > > > > web > > > > > > > >> site > > > > > > > >> > > to a > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > directory in a git repo. We can create an > > > > > > > >> apache/hamilton-site > > > > > > > >> > > repo > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > for this. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > There are other approaches that might be > > > feasible. One > > > > > > > >> example > > > > > > > >> > > is > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > pekko.apache.org content - most of it is > > > rsynced to > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > nightlies.apache.org and we use .htaccess files > > > > > > deployed > > > > > > > >> to > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > pekko.apache.org to allow the > > > nightlies.apache.org > > > > > > > >> content to > > > > > > > >> > > be > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > accessed as if it was deployed directly to > > > > > > > >> pekko.apache.org. > > > > > > > >> > > This > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > avoids having to git commit the generated > > > content > > > > > > (only > > > > > > > >> the > > > > > > > >> > > > > markdown > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > files from which the HTML is generated are in > > > git). > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 04:57, Stefan Krawczyk < > > > > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Mentors, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I assume hamilton.apache.org is the front > > > page for > > > > > > the > > > > > > > >> > > project? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I think it would currently make sense for the > > > > > > current > > > > > > > >> docs > > > > > > > >> > > page > > > > > > > >> > > > > to be > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > under that domain. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So to enable that, what do we need to do? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 1. The current docs are hosted on > > > readthedocs.org > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > >> can we > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > continue to > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > use that? or? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2. If so, then we can add a new domain - > > > > > > > >> hamilton.apache.org > > > > > > > >> > > > > which > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > would require a CNAME target to be added .. > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 3. If not, the current docs are sphinx docs, > > > how > > > > > > could > > > > > > > >> we > > > > > > > >> > > migrate > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > them > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > to the apache approved place? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Stefan > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
