https://hamilton.staged.apache.org/ is not working yet but maybe we
can concentrate on https://hamilton.apache.org/ (asf-site branch). We
can get back to Infra team if we need the staged site and we can't get
it working ourselves. I don't want to monopolise their time but we can
raise another issue in the coming days if needs be.

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:33, Stefan Krawczyk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> awesome thanks!
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:33 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Already answered by Daniel Gruno.
> > I have https://hamilton.apache.org/ working now.
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:29, PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26920 is the JIRA
> > >
> > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:27, Stefan Krawczyk <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 👍 sounds good.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:25 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks for merging my .asf.yaml.
> > > > >
> > > > > Still no luck though. I'll raise an ASF Infra JIRA to see if that
> > team
> > > > > can help us debug what is happening.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 19:35, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Okay I rebased -- should https://hamilton.staged.apache.org/ be
> > being
> > > > > > populated now as I have `asf-staging
> > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/tree/asf-staging>` with all
> > the HTML
> > > > > > under content? or?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 11:13 PM Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Cool I created this PR for that piece then
> > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1344>.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 2:29 AM PJ Fanning <[email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> The .asf.yaml will need to be merged but we can use a different
> > PR for
> > > > > > >> this.
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 at 04:48, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > Cool. @PJ I have it building <
> > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1339>
> > > > > > >> > and pushing to the asf-staging branch.  I assume we need to
> > merge
> > > > > > >> .asf.yaml
> > > > > > >> > to main before it takes effect? Should we do a separate PR
> > for that?
> > > > > > >> Then I
> > > > > > >> > can test this PR more thoroughly by having the staging branch
> > > > > deployed
> > > > > > >> (I
> > > > > > >> > know I will need to change some links)?
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 7:42 AM PJ Fanning <
> > [email protected]>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > >> > > The asf yaml docs are at
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/main/README.md#deploy
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > We probably need a section like
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > publish:
> > > > > > >> > >   whoami:    asf-site
> > > > > > >> > >   subdir:    content
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > where asf-site is the branch and content is the dir in that
> > > > > branch.
> > > > > > >> > > These 2 values are good ones as they are the most common
> > ones
> > > > > used in
> > > > > > >> > > other ASF projects.
> > > > > > >> > > These settings should mean that hamilton.apache.org is
> > redeployed
> > > > > > >> > > every time the asf-site branch is updated.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > If you read the asf yaml docs, there is also the concept of
> > a
> > > > > staging
> > > > > > >> > > web site - a preview one.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > staging:
> > > > > > >> > >   whoami:  asf-staging
> > > > > > >> > >   subdir:    content
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > asf-staging is the most common branch used for this.
> > > > > > >> > > These settings should mean that hamilton.staged.apache.org
> > is
> > > > > > >> > > redeployed every time the asf-staging branch is updated.
> > > > > > >> > > We don't necessarily need to use this staging web site but
> > the
> > > > > support
> > > > > > >> > > for it is there. It can be a nice way to try out changes
> > without
> > > > > > >> > > affecting the main site.
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >> > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 15:30, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > okay yeah I have a githhub workflow (see this PR
> > > > > > >> > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1339>) that
> > builds the
> > > > > > >> docs. I
> > > > > > >> > > can
> > > > > > >> > > > push it to a different branch other than main placing it
> > under
> > > > > > >> /content
> > > > > > >> > > > (currently it publishes the artifact to github). I think
> > I saw
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > .asf.yaml support that option. That should work right?
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 7:23 AM PJ Fanning <
> > [email protected]
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > If the website code can't be readily removed from
> > > > > apache/hamilton
> > > > > > >> repo
> > > > > > >> > > > > - then we can just leave it as is. We can set up
> > .asf.yaml in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > > apache/hamilton repo to publish the website.
> > > > > > >> > > > > I think the default is to have the website static
> > content in
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > > 'content' directory.
> > > > > > >> > > > > Stefan - can you build the static content for the
> > website and
> > > > > put
> > > > > > >> it
> > > > > > >> > > > > in the 'content' directory.
> > > > > > >> > > > > I can then try to set up .asf.yaml to deploy it.
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 15:09, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > I can see a separate hamilton-site repo that contains
> > the
> > > > > > >> landing
> > > > > > >> > > page,
> > > > > > >> > > > > but
> > > > > > >> > > > > > what about documentation that relies on source code
> > (which
> > > > > is
> > > > > > >> what
> > > > > > >> > > > > > hamilton.dagworks.io currently is)? We'd still need a
> > > > > process
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> > > > > generate
> > > > > > >> > > > > > that and push it somewhere to be published?
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 2:43 AM PJ Fanning <
> > > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > It would be my preference to separate out the
> > website docs
> > > > > > >> from
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hamilton/ and put them
> > in a
> > > > > > >> separate
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hamilton-site/ repo.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > It simplifies the release of Apache Hamilton if we
> > don't
> > > > > need
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> > > worry
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > about reviewers having to check the source headers
> > and
> > > > > > >> licensing of
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > everything needed for the website build too.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The simplest initial set up is to have
> > > > > apache/hamilton-site
> > > > > > >> git
> > > > > > >> > > repo
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > set up so that a Hamilton team member can checkout
> > the
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > apache/hamilton-site git repo and run the build on
> > their
> > > > > own
> > > > > > >> > > machine.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > The HTML etc for the website gets generated to a
> > directory
> > > > > > >> like
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > `content` or `publish`. The Hamilton team member
> > can then
> > > > > > >> commit
> > > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > content or publish directory into git. We can
> > configure
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > > .asf.yaml
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > file so that the website is redeployed based on git
> > > > > commits
> > > > > > >> that
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > include changes to the `content` or `publish` dir.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > We can look into trying to automate this later. It
> > will
> > > > > need
> > > > > > >> time
> > > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > interact with ASF Infra team to be allowed to have
> > > > > automated
> > > > > > >> jobs
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > commit to the git repo.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 07:24, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Okay just so I mentally I understand.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. We can have documentation source live under
> > /docs
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2. When a PR that changes docs is created/merged
> > we can
> > > > > > >> kick off
> > > > > > >> > > a
> > > > > > >> > > > > github
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > workflow that builds these docs
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 3. Is it correct that we could then push this
> > built
> > > > > HTML to
> > > > > > >> this
> > > > > > >> > > > > other
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > hamilton-site repo? Is that correct?
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 4. Then using the `.asf.yaml` in the hamilton-site
> > > > > repo, we
> > > > > > >> > > could use
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the .asf.yaml
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > directives
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-WebsitedeploymentserviceforGitrepositories
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > to then publish which would update
> > hamilton.apache.org.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is that right?
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Stefan
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 5:02 AM PJ Fanning <
> > > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Redirecting to dev mailing list. Private
> > mailing list
> > > > > is
> > > > > > >> for 2
> > > > > > >> > > > > things
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > - discussing and voting on new committers and
> > > > > discussing
> > > > > > >> > > security
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > issues. Everything else is meant to be
> > discussed in
> > > > > > >> public.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The main doc for web site publishing is:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >>
> > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/main/README.md
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > We already have a DNS entry set up for
> > > > > > >> hamilton.apache.org.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Most ASF projects push the static content for
> > their
> > > > > web
> > > > > > >> site
> > > > > > >> > > to a
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > directory in a git repo. We can create an
> > > > > > >> apache/hamilton-site
> > > > > > >> > > repo
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > for this.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > There are other approaches that might be
> > feasible. One
> > > > > > >> example
> > > > > > >> > > is
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > pekko.apache.org content - most of it is
> > rsynced to
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > nightlies.apache.org and we use .htaccess files
> > > > > deployed
> > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > pekko.apache.org to allow the
> > nightlies.apache.org
> > > > > > >> content to
> > > > > > >> > > be
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > accessed as if it was deployed directly to
> > > > > > >> pekko.apache.org.
> > > > > > >> > > This
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > avoids having to git commit the generated
> > content
> > > > > (only
> > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > >> > > > > markdown
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > files from which the HTML is generated are in
> > git).
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 04:57, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Mentors,
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I assume hamilton.apache.org is the front
> > page for
> > > > > the
> > > > > > >> > > project?
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I think it would currently make sense for the
> > > > > current
> > > > > > >> docs
> > > > > > >> > > page
> > > > > > >> > > > > to be
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > under that domain.
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So to enable that, what do we need to do?
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 1. The current docs are hosted on
> > readthedocs.org
> > > > > --
> > > > > > >> can we
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > continue to
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > use that? or?
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2. If so, then we can add a new domain -
> > > > > > >> hamilton.apache.org
> > > > > > >> > > > > which
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > would require a CNAME target to be added ..
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 3. If not, the current docs are sphinx docs,
> > how
> > > > > could
> > > > > > >> we
> > > > > > >> > > migrate
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > them
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > to the apache approved place?
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Stefan
> > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> >

Reply via email to