Awesome. Yeah I can now go ahead and now update all the link references
in the docs. Should have that done sometime this week.

We can then after this go through validating / verifying *just the*
`sf-hamilton` package for our first apache release - I think, right?

On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:42 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:

> Just as I sent the last mail, it appears that the staged site is
> working now too. Just a delay in the deployment, I guess.
>
> On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:40, PJ Fanning <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > https://hamilton.staged.apache.org/ is not working yet but maybe we
> > can concentrate on https://hamilton.apache.org/ (asf-site branch). We
> > can get back to Infra team if we need the staged site and we can't get
> > it working ourselves. I don't want to monopolise their time but we can
> > raise another issue in the coming days if needs be.
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:33, Stefan Krawczyk <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > awesome thanks!
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:33 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Already answered by Daniel Gruno.
> > > > I have https://hamilton.apache.org/ working now.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:29, PJ Fanning <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26920 is the JIRA
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 20:27, Stefan Krawczyk <
> [email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 👍 sounds good.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jun 17, 2025 at 12:25 PM PJ Fanning <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for merging my .asf.yaml.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Still no luck though. I'll raise an ASF Infra JIRA to see if
> that
> > > > team
> > > > > > > can help us debug what is happening.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 at 19:35, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Okay I rebased -- should https://hamilton.staged.apache.org/
> be
> > > > being
> > > > > > > > populated now as I have `asf-staging
> > > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/tree/asf-staging>` with
> all
> > > > the HTML
> > > > > > > > under content? or?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 11:13 PM Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Cool I created this PR for that piece then
> > > > > > > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1344>.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 2:29 AM PJ Fanning <
> [email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> The .asf.yaml will need to be merged but we can use a
> different
> > > > PR for
> > > > > > > > >> this.
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 at 04:48, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > Cool. @PJ I have it building <
> > > > > > > > >> https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1339>
> > > > > > > > >> > and pushing to the asf-staging branch.  I assume we
> need to
> > > > merge
> > > > > > > > >> .asf.yaml
> > > > > > > > >> > to main before it takes effect? Should we do a separate
> PR
> > > > for that?
> > > > > > > > >> Then I
> > > > > > > > >> > can test this PR more thoroughly by having the staging
> branch
> > > > > > > deployed
> > > > > > > > >> (I
> > > > > > > > >> > know I will need to change some links)?
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 7:42 AM PJ Fanning <
> > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> >
> > > > > > > > >> > > The asf yaml docs are at
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/main/README.md#deploy
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > We probably need a section like
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > publish:
> > > > > > > > >> > >   whoami:    asf-site
> > > > > > > > >> > >   subdir:    content
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > where asf-site is the branch and content is the dir
> in that
> > > > > > > branch.
> > > > > > > > >> > > These 2 values are good ones as they are the most
> common
> > > > ones
> > > > > > > used in
> > > > > > > > >> > > other ASF projects.
> > > > > > > > >> > > These settings should mean that hamilton.apache.org
> is
> > > > redeployed
> > > > > > > > >> > > every time the asf-site branch is updated.
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > If you read the asf yaml docs, there is also the
> concept of
> > > > a
> > > > > > > staging
> > > > > > > > >> > > web site - a preview one.
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > staging:
> > > > > > > > >> > >   whoami:  asf-staging
> > > > > > > > >> > >   subdir:    content
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > asf-staging is the most common branch used for this.
> > > > > > > > >> > > These settings should mean that
> hamilton.staged.apache.org
> > > > is
> > > > > > > > >> > > redeployed every time the asf-staging branch is
> updated.
> > > > > > > > >> > > We don't necessarily need to use this staging web
> site but
> > > > the
> > > > > > > support
> > > > > > > > >> > > for it is there. It can be a nice way to try out
> changes
> > > > without
> > > > > > > > >> > > affecting the main site.
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 15:30, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > okay yeah I have a githhub workflow (see this PR
> > > > > > > > >> > > > <https://github.com/apache/hamilton/pull/1339>)
> that
> > > > builds the
> > > > > > > > >> docs. I
> > > > > > > > >> > > can
> > > > > > > > >> > > > push it to a different branch other than main
> placing it
> > > > under
> > > > > > > > >> /content
> > > > > > > > >> > > > (currently it publishes the artifact to github). I
> think
> > > > I saw
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > .asf.yaml support that option. That should work
> right?
> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 7:23 AM PJ Fanning <
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > If the website code can't be readily removed from
> > > > > > > apache/hamilton
> > > > > > > > >> repo
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > - then we can just leave it as is. We can set up
> > > > .asf.yaml in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > apache/hamilton repo to publish the website.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I think the default is to have the website static
> > > > content in
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > 'content' directory.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > Stefan - can you build the static content for the
> > > > website and
> > > > > > > put
> > > > > > > > >> it
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > in the 'content' directory.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > I can then try to set up .asf.yaml to deploy it.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 15:09, Stefan Krawczyk <
> > > > > > > > >> > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > I can see a separate hamilton-site repo that
> contains
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> landing
> > > > > > > > >> > > page,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > but
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > what about documentation that relies on source
> code
> > > > (which
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > >> what
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > hamilton.dagworks.io currently is)? We'd still
> need a
> > > > > > > process
> > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > generate
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > that and push it somewhere to be published?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 2:43 AM PJ Fanning <
> > > > > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >> > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It would be my preference to separate out the
> > > > website docs
> > > > > > > > >> from
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hamilton/ and put
> them
> > > > in a
> > > > > > > > >> separate
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/hamilton-site/
> repo.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > It simplifies the release of Apache Hamilton
> if we
> > > > don't
> > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > >> > > worry
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > about reviewers having to check the source
> headers
> > > > and
> > > > > > > > >> licensing of
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > everything needed for the website build too.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The simplest initial set up is to have
> > > > > > > apache/hamilton-site
> > > > > > > > >> git
> > > > > > > > >> > > repo
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > set up so that a Hamilton team member can
> checkout
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > apache/hamilton-site git repo and run the
> build on
> > > > their
> > > > > > > own
> > > > > > > > >> > > machine.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > The HTML etc for the website gets generated
> to a
> > > > directory
> > > > > > > > >> like
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > `content` or `publish`. The Hamilton team
> member
> > > > can then
> > > > > > > > >> commit
> > > > > > > > >> > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > content or publish directory into git. We can
> > > > configure
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > .asf.yaml
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > file so that the website is redeployed based
> on git
> > > > > > > commits
> > > > > > > > >> that
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > include changes to the `content` or `publish`
> dir.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > We can look into trying to automate this
> later. It
> > > > will
> > > > > > > need
> > > > > > > > >> time
> > > > > > > > >> > > to
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > interact with ASF Infra team to be allowed to
> have
> > > > > > > automated
> > > > > > > > >> jobs
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > commit to the git repo.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025 at 07:24, Stefan Krawczyk
> <
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Okay just so I mentally I understand.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 1. We can have documentation source live
> under
> > > > /docs
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 2. When a PR that changes docs is
> created/merged
> > > > we can
> > > > > > > > >> kick off
> > > > > > > > >> > > a
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > github
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > workflow that builds these docs
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 3. Is it correct that we could then push
> this
> > > > built
> > > > > > > HTML to
> > > > > > > > >> this
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > other
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > hamilton-site repo? Is that correct?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > 4. Then using the `.asf.yaml` in the
> hamilton-site
> > > > > > > repo, we
> > > > > > > > >> > > could use
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > the .asf.yaml
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > directives
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > <
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-WebsitedeploymentserviceforGitrepositories
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > to then publish which would update
> > > > hamilton.apache.org.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Is that right?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > Stefan
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 9, 2025 at 5:02 AM PJ Fanning <
> > > > > > > > >> [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Redirecting to dev mailing list. Private
> > > > mailing list
> > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > >> for 2
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > things
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > - discussing and voting on new committers
> and
> > > > > > > discussing
> > > > > > > > >> > > security
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > issues. Everything else is meant to be
> > > > discussed in
> > > > > > > > >> public.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > The main doc for web site publishing is:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/main/README.md
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > We already have a DNS entry set up for
> > > > > > > > >> hamilton.apache.org.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > Most ASF projects push the static content
> for
> > > > their
> > > > > > > web
> > > > > > > > >> site
> > > > > > > > >> > > to a
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > directory in a git repo. We can create an
> > > > > > > > >> apache/hamilton-site
> > > > > > > > >> > > repo
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > for this.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > There are other approaches that might be
> > > > feasible. One
> > > > > > > > >> example
> > > > > > > > >> > > is
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > pekko.apache.org content - most of it is
> > > > rsynced to
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > nightlies.apache.org and we use
> .htaccess files
> > > > > > > deployed
> > > > > > > > >> to
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > pekko.apache.org to allow the
> > > > nightlies.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> content to
> > > > > > > > >> > > be
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > accessed as if it was deployed directly to
> > > > > > > > >> pekko.apache.org.
> > > > > > > > >> > > This
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > avoids having to git commit the generated
> > > > content
> > > > > > > (only
> > > > > > > > >> the
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > markdown
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > files from which the HTML is generated
> are in
> > > > git).
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2025 at 04:57, Stefan
> Krawczyk <
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi Mentors,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I assume hamilton.apache.org is the
> front
> > > > page for
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > >> > > project?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > I think it would currently make sense
> for the
> > > > > > > current
> > > > > > > > >> docs
> > > > > > > > >> > > page
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > to be
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > under that domain.
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > So to enable that, what do we need to
> do?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 1. The current docs are hosted on
> > > > readthedocs.org
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >> can we
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > continue to
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > use that? or?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 2. If so, then we can add a new domain -
> > > > > > > > >> hamilton.apache.org
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > which
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > would require a CNAME target to be added
> ..
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > 3. If not, the current docs are sphinx
> docs,
> > > > how
> > > > > > > could
> > > > > > > > >> we
> > > > > > > > >> > > migrate
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > them
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > to the apache approved place?
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > Stefan
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> > >
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > >
>

Reply via email to