2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
so what do we do? I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...
That would be great. Can you suggest something?
SY, Alexey
On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote: > Geir, > > I could not find any spec for Java CORBA API at all. I've asked here > (yoko-dev) but nobody could point me to such spec. So it seems that > every CORBA implementation implements its own vision. > Moreover RI has CORBA 2.3.1 implementation with number of exceptions > [1]. > > SY, Alexey > > [1]http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/org/omg/CORBA/doc-files/ > compliance.html > > > 2007/1/11, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote: >> >> > One of the areas with less then 100% coverage in Harmony is org.omg >> > packages. I've attached the japitools result page with the current >> > Harmony status in this area. The summary is the following: >> 84.52%. To >> > get 100% we need to fix 6 classes, 28 interfaces, 11 methods and >> > implement 2 packages, 21 classes, 12 interfaces, 72 methods, 2 >> > constructors. >> > >> > There are two main causes of such situation: >> > 1. Yoko implements CORBA 2.4 while Java 5 SE implements 2.3 >> > 2. There is no any spec for CORBA implementation on Java. >> >> Can you provide some more detail? Isn't 2.4 a superset? How can >> there ever be interop? >> >> I'm a little surprised that CORBA 2.4 doesn't contain all the >> classes/ >> interfaces/methods of CORBA 2.3. >> >> geir >> >>
