On Jan 17, 2007, at 11:11 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:

2007/1/17, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
so what do we do?  I'm hoping that we can find a way to achieve this
w/o us having to have "shadow" or duplicate code here...
That would be great. Can you suggest something?

No.

<joke>
 I had the idea of not to shadow.  your turn - tell us how :)
</joke>

This is like a running joke I have with a friend of mine - we're both from startup backgrounds and now working at big companies. The joke is that we're going to do another startup, the only question is what. I keep telling him that "lets do another startup" is my idea and contribution to the effort, and the ball is in his court for a matching contribution, namely suggesting what we're going to do. :)

Seriously, I don't understand the problem well enough. IIRC, didn't Darren from Yoko make some progress on this?

geir




SY, Alexey

On Jan 15, 2007, at 9:26 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:

> Geir,
>
> I could not find any spec for Java CORBA API at all. I've asked here
> (yoko-dev) but nobody could point me to such spec. So it seems that
> every CORBA implementation implements its own vision.
> Moreover RI has CORBA 2.3.1 implementation with number of exceptions
> [1].
>
> SY, Alexey
>
> [1]http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/org/omg/CORBA/doc-files/
> compliance.html
>
>
> 2007/1/11, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>> On Jan 11, 2007, at 10:19 AM, Alexey Petrenko wrote:
>>
>> > One of the areas with less then 100% coverage in Harmony is org.omg >> > packages. I've attached the japitools result page with the current
>> > Harmony status in this area. The summary is the following:
>> 84.52%. To
>> > get 100% we need to fix 6 classes, 28 interfaces, 11 methods and
>> > implement 2 packages, 21 classes, 12 interfaces, 72 methods, 2
>> > constructors.
>> >
>> > There are two main causes of such situation:
>> > 1. Yoko implements CORBA 2.4 while Java 5 SE implements 2.3
>> > 2. There is no any spec for CORBA implementation on Java.
>>
>> Can you provide some more detail?  Isn't 2.4 a superset?  How can
>> there ever be interop?
>>
>> I'm a little surprised that CORBA 2.4 doesn't contain all the
>> classes/
>> interfaces/methods of CORBA 2.3.
>>
>> geir
>>
>>



Reply via email to