I applied the apr updates at revision r643691 and r643693; in case
there are major issues.

-Nathan

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 9:22 PM, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any specific reason we're still on apr/apr-util 1.2.6?
>
>  I'm trying to get things running on Leopard and it seems 1.2.12 is
>  necessity. How do we want to approach such an upgrade?
>
>  I noticed that the apr-iconv is also a bit out of date.
>
>  -Nathan
>

Reply via email to