On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Tim Ellison <[email protected]> wrote: > As I was catching up on e-mails, and reading the discussion between > Chunrong and Nathan about EUT testing, it struck me that it might be > helpful if we had a shared build server hosted at the ASF. > > There are a number of machines running Hudson, so I believe we could get > a slot on a Linux machine to build and test Harmony in a way that is > more visible to the development group than the current community builds > and alerts list. > > Having community builds is still good, since the heterogeneity means we > get to hear about problems before they get out of hand, e.g. the ASF > doesn't run any Windows boxes AFAIK. > > What do you think? Should I ask infra to get a Harmony slot on the > Hudson build machine? We would have to give some indication of > predicted load and size of artifacts we would expect to use. > > Regards, > Tim >
This is a good suggestion. Well I am not sure how much it really helps unless this kind of centralized builds are used for testing as well. Thanks, xiaofeng -- Managed Runtime Technology Center, Intel
